Welcome to the all-new Vetlearn

  • Vetlearn is becoming part of NAVC VetFolio.
    Starting in January 2015, Compendium and
    Veterinary Technician articles will be available on
    NAVC VetFolio. VetFolio subscribers will have
    access to not only the journals, but also:
  • Over 500 hours of CE
  • Community forums to discuss tough cases
    and networking with your peers
  • Three years of select NAVC Conference
  • Free webinars for the entire healthcare team

To access Vetlearn, you must first sign in or register.


  Sign up now for:
Become a Member

Compendium September 2009 (Vol 31, No 9)

The Principles of Surgical Oncology: Diagnosis and Staging

by Julius M. Liptak, BVSc , MVetClinStud, FACVSc, DACVS, DECVS

    CETEST This course is approved for 3.0 CE credits

    Start Test


    The surgical treatment of neoplasms is one of the most common procedures performed in small animal practice. The proper approach to surgical oncology requires a knowledge of tumor types and their biologic behavior, different treatment modalities, and prognosis. A thorough physical examination is required to determine the presence and extent of a tumor, evaluate regional lymph nodes, and identify comorbid or paraneoplastic conditions that may influence anesthetic and surgical management. Various imaging modalities can be used for clinical staging to determine the location, size, and extent of a local tumor, as well as the presence of regional and distant metastasis. Biopsy of the tumor is often necessary to identify tumor type. Fine-needle aspiration, needle-core biopsy, incisional biopsy, or excisional biopsy may be used. The results of clinical staging tests and tumor biopsy are then used to ascertain treatment options and prognosis.


    Cancer is one of the major causes of death in cats and dogs, but it is also a treatable chronic disease. Even if treatment is ultimately not curative, the period between treatment and death is frequently associated with a better quality of life than would otherwise be afforded. The successful treatment of animals with neoplasia requires a positive, dedicated, but realistic approach by both the owner and veterinarian. Choosing the appropriate treatment requires a knowledge of the biologic behavior of tumors as well as treatment options. Treatment may need to integrate multiple disciplines, including surgery, medical oncology, and radiation oncology. This multimodality effort is aimed at maximizing the benefits of treatment and the potential for cure while minimizing adverse effects.1,2

    Surgery plays a pivotal role in oncology, particularly for the diagnosis and definitive treatment of solid tumors. Surgery is the most effective way to treat solid tumors, is noncarcinogenic, and is less immunosuppressive than radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Surgery also has a role in cancer prevention and palliation. Disadvantages to surgery include associated morbidity, such as functional impairment (e.g., limb amputation), and cosmetic issues (e.g., radical bilateral maxillectomy).1,2

    A knowledge of the principles and proper practice of surgical oncology is essential to the appropriate management of cats and dogs with neoplasia. The principles involve diagnostic workup and clinical staging; knowledge of the indications for, limitations of, and techniques for surgical biopsy and resection; and an understanding of how surgery can be used in combination with other treatments such as radiation therapy. Appropriate planning and adherence to the principles of surgical oncology should address the following questions3:

    • What are the type and stage of the tumor?
    • Do the biopsy results correlate with the clinical presentation?
    • What is the biologic behavior of the tumor?
    • What is the proper surgical approach (e.g., intralesional, marginal, wide, radical resection)?
    • What are the alternatives or adjuncts to surgical resection?
    • What are the owner's expectations, and are these expectations reasonable?


    Neoplasms tend to be diagnosed more commonly in older animals, but they can affect animals of any age. Tumors known to occur in younger animals include certain oral tumors (e.g., benign inductive fibroameloblastoma in cats, undifferentiated malignant oral tumors in dogs),4 renal nephroblastoma,5 and canine appendicular osteosarcoma (OSA).6 Age can provide some prognostic information. Malignant tumors in younger animals tend to have a more aggressive biologic behavior than the same disease in older animals, as in dogs with appendicular OSA.6 It is important to remember that age is not a disease; advancing age does not influence tumor biology or response to treatment and, hence, does not preclude the use of curative-intent treatment options such as aggressive surgery, full-course radiation therapy, or chemotherapy.7,8 Physiologic function and comorbid conditions should be the major factors in determining treatment options.8 In fact, most clinical reports detailing encouraging outcomes for neoplasms involve older animals. For example, the median survival time (MST) for 75 dogs (median age: 10.6 years) with surgically resected soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) was 1416 days,9 and the MST for 42 dogs (median age: 11.0 years) after liver lobectomy for massive hepatocellular carcinoma exceeded 1460 days.10 Breed and sex predispositions have been reported for various tumors but rarely provide useful diagnostic or prognostic information.

    Physical Examination

    The physical examination is important for the assessment of general health status as well as neoplastic and comorbid conditions. Findings may influence the selection of management options because certain conditions, such as paraneoplastic syndromes (e.g., cancer cachexia) and nonneoplastic concomitant diseases (e.g., renal failure, congestive heart failure), affect anesthetic and surgical management.

    The physical examination should also be used to evaluate the primary tumor, regional lymph nodes, and any other tumors found. The characteristics of the primary tumor are important for clinical staging and may assist in determining treatment options (e.g., local resection versus limb amputation for extremity STS, depending on size and degree of fixation) and prognosis. If regional lymph nodes are enlarged, firm, or fixed, then the diagnostic workup, treatment options, and prognosis may change because of the need for lymph node biopsy to determine whether the lymph node is reactive or metastatic. If it is metastatic, more aggressive surgery may be required for appropriate management, or another modality may be preferable to surgery (e.g., chemotherapy for dogs with a metastatic mast cell tumor [MCT]). However, although palpation of the regional lymph nodes is important during physical examination, it is not as accurate as either fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or biopsy, and, for tumors such as oral melanoma, assessment of regional lymph node status should not depend on palpation alone.11 It is also essential to look beyond the presenting mass for other tumors. For example, multiple MCTs are reported in up to 14% of dogs and 20% of cats,12 and 50% of dogs with adrenal pheochromocytomas have additional, unrelated tumors.13

    Blood Tests

    General blood tests, such as hematology and serum biochemistry panels, are important to identify conditions that may influence anesthetic and surgical management (e.g., anemia, hypoproteinemia, renal failure, liver failure) and paraneoplastic syndromes (e.g., hypercalcemia, hypoglycemia; BOX 1 ). More specific blood tests may be required for certain tumors, such as parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related protein assays for assessment of animals with hypercalcemia. Clotting times should be evaluated for certain breeds (e.g., Doberman pinscher), tumors (e.g., splenic hemangiosarcoma, mammary carcinoma), and procedures with a high risk of intraoperative hemorrhage (e.g., maxillectomy, chest wall resection, thyroidectomy). Unlike human oncology, tumor markers are not well established for the diagnosis and monitoring of animals with cancer.14

    Tumor Biopsy

    Biopsy provides essential information for diagnosis (neoplastic versus nonneoplastic, benign versus malignant), treatment options, and prognosis. There are four main types of biopsy technique: FNA, needle-core biopsy, incisional biopsy, and excisional biopsy. Regardless of the technique performed, the same instruments should not be used to sample multiple masses because of the risk of contamination. Samples of cells or tissue are submitted for cytologic or histopathologic analysis, respectively. The ideal biopsy technique should simply and safely procure an adequate sample of tissue and consistently result in an accurate diagnosis.2 Faulty techniques and instruments can damage the sample, resulting in an incorrect diagnosis or failure to make a diagnosis.15 Biopsy results enable the oncologist to determine the (1) type of tumor, (2) biologic behavior of the tumor, (3) appropriate level of aggression for surgical resection (surgical dose), (4) need for adjunctive therapy, and (5) likely prognosis. BOX 2 provides a clinical example of this information.

    However, a biopsy is not required for every tumor before definitive treatment (BOX 3). The three principal reasons for performing a biopsy are if the results may affect one or more of the following15,16:

    • Treatment options (e.g., mandibulectomy or maxillectomy for most oral tumors versus coarse-fraction radiation therapy for an oral melanoma)
    • Extent of treatment (e.g., less than 1 cm lateral surgical margins for a benign histiocytoma versus 3 cm lateral surgical margins for a cutaneous STS)
    • Owner's willingness to treat (e.g., if an owner is averse to chemotherapy, biopsy of a suspected primary bone tumor can differentiate rib and appendicular OSA, for which chemotherapy is recommended, from other primary bone tumors that do not require adjuvant chemotherapy, such as chondrosarcoma)

    Fine-Needle Aspiration

    In general, the likelihood of an accurate diagnosis improves with biopsy techniques that procure a larger volume of tissue.15 However, FNA is economical, does not require sedation or general anesthesia, can be diagnostic for certain tumor types (e.g., MCT), and guides therapy by differentiating nonneoplastic from neoplastic diseases and classifying tumors as round cell, epithelial cell, or mesenchymal (spindle) cell.17

    FNA is readily performed on cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions, but accurate aspiration of samples from within intracavitary structures (e.g., retrobulbar space, thoracic cavity, abdominal cavity) may require guidance via ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT).18 Cytologic assessment of FNA samples provides better information about cytoplasmic and nuclear detail than histopathologic evaluation of surgical biopsy samples, but surgical samples provide better information about structural and architectural detail.19 The techniques of FNA and proper slide preparation are discussed in detail elsewhere.20

    The diagnostic accuracy of FNA depends on technique, tumor type, and tumor location. For most tumors, it is lower than that of needle-core, incisional, or excisional biopsy, but the cost, complexity, and potential complications of FNA are decreased compared with the other techniques. The accuracy of FNA is improved by using 21-gauge or larger hypodermic needles, with a minimum of 10 insertions into the mass.21 In general, FNA is more accurate for cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions than for intracavitary lesions, particularly splenic and hepatic masses.17,22 It is also more sensitive for round cell and epithelial tumors (70% to 100% and 67% to 98%, respectively) than for mesenchymal tumors (50% to 61%)17,18 because epithelial and round cell tumors exfoliate large numbers of cells in sheets, whereas spindle cell tumors exfoliate cells individually and in low numbers. Between 13% and 35% of FNA samples are nondiagnostic, usually because of hemodilution and blood contamination.18,22 Overall accuracy rates range from 64% to more than 90%, with sensitivities and specificities from 64% to 96% and 65% to 100%, respectively.17,18

    Needle-Core Biopsy

    Needle-core biopsy provides a small volume of tissue for impression smears or histopathology. Examples of techniques include TruCut needle-core biopsy for samples from organs and other soft tissue structures and Jamshidi needle-core biopsy for bone samples. Ultrasound-guided biopsies of intraabdominal organs can be performed with specialized needle-core biopsy instruments.

    Sedation and local anesthesia are usually sufficient for obtaining needle-core biopsy samples.15,16 Local anesthesia is not required for needle-core biopsy of oral tumors, which are poorly innervated, but should be used in the overlying skin for cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions so a small incision can be made for insertion of the biopsy needle.15,16 The infiltration of local anesthetic agents into or adjacent to the tumor should be avoided because of an increased risk of metastasis and distortion of histologic architecture.2 Once the biopsy has been performed, the core of tissue should be carefully removed with a scalpel blade, hypodermic needle, or fine tissue forceps to avoid iatrogenic damage to the sample.15 In general, the diagnostic accuracy of needle-core biopsy is superior to that of FNA but inferior to that of incisional or excisional biopsy.16 As a result, obtaining multiple needle-core biopsy samples is often recommended to improve diagnostic accuracy.16,23

    The diagnostic accuracy of needle-core biopsy for neoplastic diseases is excellent, with reported sensitivities, specificities, and positive predictive values as high as 96%, 97%, and 96%, respectively, and 100% of epithelial cell tumors and 94% of mesenchymal tumors correlating with surgical biopsy results.19 Complications are rare but include fistula formation, hemorrhage, infection, and tumor seeding.22

    Incisional Biopsy

    Incisional biopsy techniques, which include wedge and punch biopsy, are recommended in most cases, especially for soft, friable, inflamed, and necrotic tumors; peripheral lymph nodes; and masses located on the extremities.15,16 Incisional biopsy can be performed using sedation and local or regional anesthesia, but general anesthesia is occasionally required. As with needle-core biopsy, incisional biopsy can be performed using sedation without local anesthesia in dogs with oral tumors.15

    An incisional biopsy sample should include a junction between normal and abnormal tissue so that tumor invasion into normal tissue can be assessed.15,23 However, some surgeons believe that this may disrupt and extend the tumor margins because cellular activity is greatest in the peripheral aspects of the tumor.1,15 Normal tissue should not be included in the biopsy sample if it will be required for reconstructive procedures after definitive resection. Incisional biopsy should not be performed in areas of inflammation, necrosis, or ulceration because this increases the possibility that the sample will not be representative of the disease process.15,16 Aseptic technique with meticulous hemostasis and reduction of dead space is required to minimize the risk of complications such as hematoma and tumor spread.15 Drains should not be used because tumor cells will seed along the drainage tract and potentially complicate definitive surgical resection15 (FIGURE 1).

    When performing an incisional biopsy, it is important to plan the location and direction so that the biopsy scar and tract, which are contaminated with tumor cells, can be resected en bloc with the tumor, using appropriate surgical margins. Poorly planned surgical biopsies can have a dramatic impact on case management by increasing the surgical dose required for complete resection, limiting treatment options, or making further treatment impossible.24"36 For example, incisional biopsy of an oral mass through the overlying lip16 would spread tumor cells into the lip, which is rarely involved in oral tumors, subsequently requiring either a more aggressive surgical resection to remove the biopsy tract through the lip or the use of radiation therapy in combination with surgical resection because of the increased risk of incomplete resection. Such a biopsy approach may also make it impossible to resect the tumor and adequately reconstruct the defect because the labial mucosa is no longer available for reconstruction. To avoid inappropriate approaches, the incisional biopsy should be performed by the same surgeon who will undertake definitive surgery so that both the primary tumor and biopsy tract can be resected en bloc without compromising the ability to completely excise the tumor or the functional and cosmetic outcome.1,26

    Excisional Biopsy

    The role of excisional biopsy is controversial. Excisional biopsy is one of the more commonly performed techniques in veterinary medicine because of its potential to combine both diagnosis and therapy in a single procedure.16 Ideally, it is considered the procedure of choice only if it can be performed without contaminating new tissue planes or further compromising the ultimate surgical procedure. However, this is often not possible in cats and dogs with neoplasia, and without prior knowledge of tumor type, the chance that an excisional biopsy will be therapeutic as well as diagnostic is random. Hence, an excisional biopsy should only be performed when treatment will not be affected by knowledge of the tumor type (e.g., splenic tumor).15 A less invasive biopsy procedure, such as FNA or needle-core biopsy, may provide sufficient information to plan the definitive surgical procedure and is preferable to excisional biopsy.

    The initial surgical procedure provides the best chance for a cure and should not be compromised by inadequate planning.2,3 For example, the MST for cats after unplanned excisional biopsy of a VAS is 2 months, which is significantly worse than the MST of up to 16 months after an appropriately planned, curative-intent resection.27,28 Likewise, an excisional biopsy of a cutaneous MCT, which can be easily diagnosed with FNA cytology, will result in incomplete excision because of insufficient margins if the tumor type is not known before surgical resection. This confers unnecessary risk because of the need for further anesthesia and more extensive surgery or radiation therapy. Also, local tumor recurrence significantly decreases survival time in dogs with MCTs.29

    If an excisional biopsy must be performed, it should be carefully planned with the knowledge that surgical resection of the biopsy tract will be required if the mass is not completely excised. This may be appropriate for tumors located in areas with sufficient soft tissue coverage to allow subsequent resection and primary closure, such as the lateral thoracic and abdominal walls, but is not recommended for areas with limited tissue availability, such as the head and limbs.


    Tissue samples from needle-core, incisional, and excisional biopsies should be fixed in 10% buffered formalin at one part tissue to 10 parts formalin.1,15,26 Brain, peripheral nerve, eye, and muscle tissue require special handling techniques and fixatives.16 All samples should be submitted to a veterinary pathologist because the histologic type and grade of tumor are often important in treatment planning. If the biopsy results do not correlate with the clinical presentation, then the clinician should discuss the case with the pathologist and request resectioning, special stains (e.g., toluidine blue for MCTs or immunohistochemistry), or a second opinion from another pathologist.2,15,23 Histopathologic confirmation is still required after definitive surgical resection, as biopsies only sample a small region of the tumor and may not be representative of the true tumor type because of tumor heterogeneity. For example, appendicular OSA is often misdiagnosed as fibrosarcoma or chondrosarcoma based on needle-core biopsy results because of the fibroblastic or chondroblastic proliferation in some OSAs.16

    Clinical Staging

    If a tumor is considered to be malignant on the basis of either clinical suspicion or biopsy confirmation, clinical staging should be done to describe the extent of the local tumor and the presence of regional and distant metastatic disease. Palpation and imaging are used to determine the size of the primary tumor and degree of local invasion (FIGURE 2). A biopsy is recommended in most cases for preoperative diagnosis of the primary lesion.

    Local Tumor Imaging

    Imaging of the primary tumor is important for evaluating tumor location and degree of involvement with adjacent structures and for surgical planning. A number of imaging modalities are available for these purposes. Radiography is recommended for assessing the presence and extent of tumors of the appendicular and axial skeleton, lungs, and cranial mediastinum.


    Ultrasonography is a useful and cost-effective tool for the evaluation of intraabdominal neoplasms, particularly hepatic, adrenal, and urogenital tumors, and sublumbar node metastasis. Ultrasonography can also be used to guide FNA and needle-core biopsy for relatively noninvasive tissue sampling. Newer developments in ultrasound technology that have proved useful in the evaluation of primary tumors include Doppler ultrasonography to assess tumor vascularity (e.g., thyroid carcinomas in dogs) and contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasonography for differentiation of benign from malignant hepatic and splenic tumors.30 As an example of the benefits of ultrasonography in surgical planning, it can be used to differentiate noninvasive from invasive adrenal tumors.27 The anesthetic and surgical planning of adrenalectomy for an isolated adrenal tumor is less complicated than an adrenalectomy with en bloc thrombectomy via partial cavotomy.31

    Nuclear Scintigraphy

    Nuclear scintigraphy has some distinct advantages in the diagnostic workup of certain tumor types. For instance, whole-body bone scanning using radiolabeled technetium-99m hydroxymethylene diphosphate is particularly useful for the detection of asymptomatic synchronous or metastatic OSA lesions. In one study,32 7.8% of 399 dogs with appendicular OSA were found to have a second, asymptomatic bone lesion using nuclear scintigraphy. This has important implications for case management, as these dogs are no longer candidates for limb amputation because of the risk of pathologic fracture and catastrophic failure through the second lesion. Whole-body bone scanning can also be used to plan surgical margins for dogs undergoing limb-sparing surgery.33 Other indications for nuclear scintigraphy include glomerular filtration rate scanning (with technetium-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) for evaluation of renal function before planned nephrectomy for primary renal tumors or tumors with secondary renal involvement,34 technetium-99m scanning for cats and dogs with functional thyroid tumors to identify ectopic or metastatic disease,34 and somatostatin receptor scanning (with indium-111 pentetreotide) to identify primary and metastatic lesions in dogs with functional pancreatic insulinomas.35

    Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Advanced imaging techniques such as CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have revolutionized the management of animals with neoplasia. For example, before the advent of these imaging modalities, the localization of brain tumors was often based on clinical signs alone, but now CT and MRI scans are used to provide accurate three-dimensional information about tumor location for stereotactic CT-guided biopsy, radioablation, and surgical resection.36 In general, CT is preferred for the evaluation of bones and MRI for soft tissue structures, but there is considerable overlap. CT is recommended for evaluation of primary tumors of the axial skeleton, particularly the skull (FIGURE 3), vertebral and pelvic tumors, and primary and metastatic intrathoracic tumors (because the quality of MRI is decreased by respiratory motion).37 CT is faster than MRI but has lower contrast resolution and requires iodinated contrast agents and ionizing radiation.37

    MRI is preferred for tumors of the central (FIGURE 4) and peripheral nervous system and, perhaps, intraabdominal organs.37 In addition, MRI has higher soft tissue resolution than CT and does not use iodine-based contrast agents. However, MRI takes longer to perform, metallic implants are a contraindication, and artifacts are common, particularly with motion.37 Ultrasonography can provide similar information to MRI for localization and surgical planning of intraabdominal neoplasms, but tumor characteristics on T1- and T2-weighted MRI may provide further information on tumor type.38

    Positron-emission tomography, which provides in vivo information on biochemical and physiologic processes such as glucose metabolism, is not widely available in veterinary medicine.39

    Advanced imaging should be performed before biopsy because tissue may be distorted by the biopsy procedure or resultant complications, such as seroma or hematoma formation.

    Lymph Node Staging

    Lymph node status is important in the clinical staging of cancer in cats and dogs. Regional lymph nodes should be carefully palpated for enlargement, asymmetry, and degree of fixation. However, caution should be exercised when making clinical judgments of metastasis to the regional lymph nodes based on palpation alone because lymph node size is not an accurate predictor of metastasis. In one study of 100 dogs with oral malignant melanoma, 40% of dogs with normal-sized lymph nodes had metastases and 49% of dogs with enlarged lymph nodes did not.11 Therefore, biopsy is recommended to determine regional lymph node status in animals with malignant disease. FNA is usually sufficient, but incisional or excisional biopsy is sometimes required.

    The sentinel lymph node (SLN) is a significant concept in human surgical oncology, based on the theory that the metastatic process occurs in an orderly progression within the lymphatic system, with tumor cells draining into a specific lymph node (i.e., the SLN) in a regional lymphatic field before draining into other regional lymph nodes.40 The SLN has a major role as a filter and barrier for disseminating tumor cells.40 Conceptually, distant metastasis should not be present if there is no evidence of tumor burden in the SLN, but distant metastasis is possible if the SLN is positive for tumor cells. Hence, the status of the SLN may reflect the status of the entire regional lymphatic bed.40-43 In human medicine, determining the SLN is crucial to the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis, early identification of patients requiring additional therapy to manage metastatic disease, and establishment of prognosis.44 However, the concept of the SLN has not yet been widely tested or accepted in veterinary medicine.

    Distant Metastasis Staging

    Three-view thoracic radiography is commonly used in the clinical staging of animals with cancer to evaluate for the presence of pulmonary metastasis. Right and left lateral thoracic projections are necessary because increased perfusion and atelectasis in the dependent lung fields result in poor contrast with metastatic lesions, which also have a soft tissue density (FIGURE 5). The nondependent lung fields have better ventilation, which (combined with greater lesion-to-film magnification) increases the possibility of detecting metastatic lesions (FIGURE 6). Using high-detail screens, metastatic lesions as small as 6 mm can be detected on thoracic radiographs.45 Thoracic CT is more sensitive than radiography for the detection of metastatic lesions and can delineate lesions as small as 1 mm.46

    The imaging modalities used to assess for the presence of metastatic disease are tailored to the tumor type. For example, three-view thoracic radiography is indicated to assess for pulmonary metastasis of a wide range of tumors, particularly visceral hemangiosarcoma and appendicular OSA,45,47 but not for canine MCT (in which pulmonary metastases are very rare).12 Abdominal ultrasonography and guided FNA of the spleen and liver are recommended to evaluate for systemic mastocytosis in dogs with high-grade MCT and also for metastasis in dogs with histiocytic sarcoma.12 Nuclear scintigraphy is used to assess for bone metastasis in dogs with appendicular OSA.28 Based on these findings, tumors are clinically staged according to a specific system.

    The World Health Organization's TNM staging system is frequently used in veterinary medicine. In this system, T represents characteristics of the primary tumor, N represents the regional lymph nodes, and M represents distant metastasis (TABLE 1).48 Other staging systems are occasionally used for specific tumor types because of their prognostic importance, such as splenic hemangiosarcomas, for which stage I tumors (localized) have a significantly better prognosis than either stage II (ruptured) or stage III (metastatic) tumors.47 All staging systems are used to facilitate communication between veterinary oncologists, monitor response to treatment, and provide prognostic information7; therefore, regardless of the system used, tumor staging should be done in a standardized, reproducible manner.

     Read the companion article, "The Principles of Surgical Oncology: Surgery and Multimodality Therapy".

    Downloadable PDF

    1. Gilson SD, Stone EA. Principles of oncologic surgery. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1990;12:827-838.

    2. Soderstrom MJ, Gilson SD. Principles of surgical oncology. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1995;25:97-110.

    3. Withrow SJ. Surgical oncology. In: Withrow SJ, MacEwen EG, eds. Small Animal Clinical Oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2001:70-76.

    4. Dubielzig RR, Adams WM, Brodey RS. Inductive fibroameloblastoma, an unusual dental tumor of young cats. JAVMA 1979;174:720-722.

    5. Baskins GB, De Paoli A. Primary renal neoplasms of the dog. Vet Pathol 1977;14:591-605.

    6. Spodnick GJ, Berg RJ, Rand WM, et al. Prognosis for dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma treated by amputation alone: 162 cases (1978-1988). JAVMA 1992;200:995-999.

    7. Dernell WS, Withrow SJ. Preoperative patient planning and margin evaluation. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 1998;13:17-21.

    8. Kennedy BJ. Aging and cancer. Oncology 2000;14:1731-1734, 1739-1740.

    9. Kuntz CA, Dernell WS, Powers BE, et al. Prognostic factors for surgical treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas in dogs: 75 cases (1986-1996). JAVMA 1997;211:1147-1151.

    10. Liptak JM, Dernell WS, Monnet E, et al. Massive hepatocellular carcinoma in dogs: 48 cases (1992-2002). JAVMA 2004;225:1225-1230.

    11. Williams LE, Packer RA. Association between lymph node size and metastasis in dogs with oral malignant melanoma: 100 cases (1987-2001). JAVMA 2003;222:1234-1236.

    12. Thamm DH, Vail DM. Mast cell tumors. In: Withrow SJ, MacEwen EG, eds. Small Animal Clinical Oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2001:261-282.

    13. Gilson SD, Withrow SJ, Wheeler SL, Twedt DC. Pheochromocytoma in 50 dogs. J Vet Intern Med 1994;8:228-232.

    14. Sokoll LJ, Chan DW. Clinical chemistry: tumor markers. In: Abeloff MD, Armitage JO, Niederhuber JE, et al, eds. Clinical Oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2004:329-339.

    15. Withrow SJ. Biopsy principles. In: Withrow SJ, MacEwen EG, eds. Small Animal Clinical Oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2001:63-69.

    16. Ehrhart N. Principles of tumor biopsy. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 1998;13:10-16.

    17. Cohen M, Bohling MW, Wright JC, et al. Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of cytologic examination: 269 cases (1999-2000). JAVMA 2003;222:964-967.

    18. Bonfanti U, Bussadori C, Zatelli A, et al. Percutaneous fine-needle biopsy of deep thoracic and abdominal masses in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract 2004;45:191-198.

    19. Aitken ML, Patnaik AK. Comparison of needle-core (Trucut) biopsy and surgical biopsy for the diagnosis of cutaneous and subcutaneous masses: a prospective study of 51 cases (November 1997-August 1998). JAAHA 2000;36:153-157.

    20. Meinkoth JH, Cowell RL. Sample collection and preparation in cytology: increasing diagnostic yield. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2002;32:1187-1207.

    21. Hartley MN, Tuffnell DJ, Hutton JL, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology: an in vitro study of cell yield. Br J Surg 1988;75:380-381.

    22. Zekas LJ, Crawford JT, O'Brien RT. Computed tomography-guided fine-needle aspirate and tissue-core biopsy of intrathoracic lesions in thirty dogs and cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005;46:200-204.

    23. Powers BE. The pathology of neoplasia. In: Withrow SJ, MacEwen EG, eds. Small Animal Clinical Oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2001:4-17.

    24. Mankin HJ, Lange TA, Spanier SS. The hazards of biopsy in patients with malignant primary bone and soft tissue tumors. J Bone Joint Surg 1982;64A:1121-1127.

    25. Mankin HJ, Mankin CJ, Simon MA. The hazards of the biopsy, revisited. Members of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society. J Bone Joint Surg 1996;78-A:656-663.

    26. Kharti VP, Goodnight JE. Extremity soft tissue sarcoma: controversial management issues. Surg Oncol 2005;14:1-9.

    27. Hershey AE, Sorenmo KU, Hendrick MJ, et al. Prognosis for presumed feline vaccine-associated sarcoma after excision: 61 cases (1986-1996). JAVMA 2000;216:58.

    28. Davidson EB, Gregory CR, Kass PH. Surgical excision of soft tissue fibrosarcomas in cats. Vet Surg 1997;26:265.

    29. Sfiligoi G, Rassnick KM, Scarlett JM, et al. Outcome of dogs with mast cell tumors in the inguinal or perineal region versus other cutaneous locations: 124 cases (1990-2001). JAVMA 2005;226:1368-1374.

    30. O'Brien RT, Iani M, Matheson J, et al. Contrast harmonic ultrasound of spontaneous liver nodules in 32 dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2004;45:547-553.

    31. Kyles AE, Feldman EC, De Cock HEV, et al. Surgical management of adrenal gland tumors with and without associated tumor thrombi in dogs: 40 cases (1994-2001). JAVMA 2003;223:654-662.

    32. Jankowski MK, Steyn PF, Lana SE, et al. Nuclear scanning with 99mTc-HDP for the initial evaluation of osseous metastasis in canine osteosarcoma. Vet Comp Oncol 2003;1:152-158.

    33. Leibman NF, Kuntz CA, Steyn PF, et al. Accuracy of radiography, nuclear scintigraphy, and histopathology for determining the proximal extent of distal radial osteosarcoma in dogs. Vet Surg 2001;30:240-245.

    34. Poteet BA. Veterinary nuclear medicine. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC, eds. Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005:354-374.

    35. Garden OA, Reubi JC, Dykes NK, et al. Somatostatin receptor imaging in vivo by planar scintigraphy facilitates the diagnosis of canine insulinomas. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005;19:168-176.

    36. LeCouteur RA. Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of brain tumours in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract 1999;40:411-416.

    37. Alberico RA, Husain SH, Sirotkin I. Imaging in head and neck oncology. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 2004;13:13-35.

    38. Clifford CA, Pretorius ES, Weisse C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of focal splenic and hepatic lesions in the dog. J Vet Intern Med 2004;18:330-338.

    39. Jerusalem G, Hustinx R, Beguin Y, et al. The value of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in disease staging and therapy assessment. Ann Oncol 2002;13(Suppl 4):227-234.

    40. Dahl K, Westlin J, Kraaz W, et al. Identification of sentinel nodes in patients with colon cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31:381-385.

    41. Simmons R, Thevarajah S, Brennan MB, et al. Methylene blue dye as an alternative to isosulfan blue dye for sentinel lymph node localization. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:242-247.

    42. Cox C, Centeno B, Dickson D, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative imprint cytology for sentinel lymph node evaluation in the treatment of breast carcinoma: a 6-year study. Cancer 2005;105:13-20.

    43. Kitagawa Y, Fujii H, Kumai K, et al. Recent advances in sentinel lymph node navigation for gastric cancer: a paradigm shift of surgical management. J Surg Oncol 2005;90:147-152.

    44. Estourgie SH, Nieweg OE, Kroon BBR. The sentinel node procedure in patients with melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004;30:713-714.

    45. Dernell WS, Straw RC, Withrow SJ. Tumors of the skeletal system. In: Withrow SJ, MacEwen EG, eds. Small Animal Clinical Oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2001:378-417.

    46. Paoloni MC, Adams WM, Dubielzig RR, et al. Comparison of results of computed tomography and radiography with histopathologic findings in tracheobronchial lymph nodes in dogs with primary lung tumors: 14 cases (1999-2002). JAVMA 2006;228:1718-1722.

    47. MacEwen EG. Hemangiosarcoma. In: Withrow SJ, MacEwen EG, eds. Small Animal Clinical Oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2001:639-646.

    48. Owen LN, ed. TNM Classification of Tumors in Domestic Animals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1980.

    References »

    NEXT: The Principles of Surgical Oncology: Surgery and Multimodality Therapy

    CETEST This course is approved for 3.0 CE credits

    Start Test


    Did you know... The most common bladder neoplasm in horses is squamous cell carcinoma.Read More

    These Care Guides are written to help your clients understand common conditions. They are formatted to print and give to your clients for their information.

    Stay on top of all our latest content — sign up for the Vetlearn newsletters.
    • More