Welcome to the all-new Vetlearn

  • Vetlearn is becoming part of NAVC VetFolio.
    Starting in January 2015, Compendium and
    Veterinary Technician articles will be available on
    NAVC VetFolio. VetFolio subscribers will have
    access to not only the journals, but also:
  • Over 500 hours of CE
  • Community forums to discuss tough cases
    and networking with your peers
  • Three years of select NAVC Conference
  • Free webinars for the entire healthcare team

To access Vetlearn, you must first sign in or register.


  Sign up now for:
Become a Member

Compendium May 2012 (Vol 34, No 5)

Minimally Invasive Abdominal and Thoracic Surgery: Principles and Instrumentation

by Jennifer L. Lansdowne, DVM, MSc, DACVS-SA, DECVS-SA, Stephen J. Mehler, DVM, DACVS, Ludovic P. Boure, DVM, MSc, DACVS, DECVS

    CETEST This course is approved for 3.0 CE credits

    Start Test


    Minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopy, thoracoscopy, and endoscopic-assisted procedures, is becoming more common in veterinary medicine. The basic principles of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy involve gaining access to a cavity through small incisions, creating a workspace, and maneuvering extracorporeally activated instruments within that workspace.

    The term minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is used for procedures that are performed completely under endoscopic guidance (e.g., laparoscopy, thoracoscopy), negating the need for large incisions to enter a cavity. The terms less invasive and endoscopic-assisted imply that procedures are performed with the aid of endoscopic equipment, permitting smaller incisions than traditional procedures. Endoscopic-assisted procedures generally involve using a rigid endoscope to improve visualization and/or access or to permit completion of the procedure through markedly smaller incisions compared with traditional open techniques. Examples of endoscopic-assisted procedures currently performed in small animals include intestinal biopsy, intestinal foreign-body removal, cystotomy, and gastropexy.

    Today in human medicine, most abdominal and thoracic surgical procedures can be performed using minimally invasive or less invasive techniques. Although advancement of veterinary medicine in the field of MIS lags behind human medicine, the past 10 years have seen a dramatic increase in techniques described for laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in animals.1–10 Minimally invasive veterinary diagnostic and surgical procedures are currently performed at many academic institutions and private practices around the world. This advancement has largely been driven by a changing client base that recognizes and seeks out less invasive alternatives and by clinicians motivated to learn new procedures and provide cutting-edge techniques to their clientele. There is little doubt that laparoscopy, thoracoscopy, and endoscopic-assisted procedures have staked a permanent place in the veterinary profession, and their increased use is inevitable. This article summarizes current principles and instrumentation of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy, including indications and contraindications, advantages and disadvantages, anesthetic implications, and equipment. A companion article summarizes laparoscopic and thoracoscopic techniques that can be performed by clinicians and describes some recent advances and future directions.

    Basic Principles of Laparoscopy and Thoracoscopy

    The basic principles of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy involve gaining access to a cavity through small incisions, creating a workspace, and (using triangulation) maneuvering instruments within that workspace. These instruments are controlled extracorporeally and viewed remotely on a monitor. This is a relatively new concept for veterinary surgeons and involves some specific considerations regarding patient and surgeon positioning, effects of creating a workspace, and anesthesia.

    Patient Positioning

    Patient positioning includes the recumbency of the animal (dorsal, sternal, lateral, or lateral oblique) and whether the head will be tilted down (Trendelenburg position), be tilted up (reverse Trendelenburg position), or remain neutral. Thoracoscopy is generally performed with animals in a neutral position, but for laparoscopy, the effect of positioning can greatly improve working space and facilitate some procedures. Tilting the head up or down allows gravity to pull the abdominal viscera away from the area of surgical interest. The head-down or Trendelenburg position (FIGURE 1) has been reported to be 10° to 30° from horizontal; 10° to 20° is usually adequate for most procedures in small animals and is indicated (for example) for performing laparoscopic cystotomy or abdominal cryptorchidectomy. Most simple procedures, such as liver biopsies, can be done without tilting the patient.

    Equipment Placement

    Placement of the endoscope and instrument ports varies with each procedure. In general, the endoscope is placed in direct line with the organ of interest, and the instrument portals are placed on each side of the endoscope to create a triangle that points away from the organ of interest (FIGURE 2). Placement of instruments too close to the area of interest can severely limit maneuverability within the cavity and prevent completion of the procedure. Portal placement for specific procedures is discussed in the companion article and in depth elsewhere.1,11

    Key Points

    • The TV monitor should always be positioned in a straight line with the surgeon’s body, and, ideally, the endoscope should be directed toward the monitor.
    • Pneumoperitoneum is well tolerated in healthy animals if ventilation can be increased to compensate for the increase in amount of CO2 requiring elimination.
    • A controlled pneumothorax is used for many diagnostic procedures in thoracoscopy; however, one-lung ventilation is recommended for more advanced procedures.
    • Retrieval bags should be used to remove masses from a cavity to help reduce the risk of seeding the portal site.

    The position of the laparoscopic/thoracoscopic tower (monitor) is important in facilitating the procedure. It should always be in a straight line with the surgeon’s body, and, ideally, the endoscope should be directed toward the monitor (FIGURE 3). If the tower is to the side of or behind the surgeon, it makes instrument operation difficult, similar to operating in front of a mirror. In advanced procedures in which surgery is to be performed on both sides of the patient, an unscrubbed assistant should be available to move the tower and keep it perfectly positioned. The ideal situation is to have two or more monitors available in the operating room.

    Positioning of the surgical team and the operating instrument table is a skill that can be perfected with experience. Ideal team positioning is different for every procedure. Examples of surgical team position relative to the patient, the tower, and the instrument table can be found elsewhere.1,11

    Pneumoperitoneum and Anesthetic Considerations During Laparoscopy

    Pneumoperitoneum must be created to enable visualization of the organs and maneuvering within the abdomen. This is achieved by insufflating the abdomen with carbon dioxide (CO2), known as capnoperitoneum. CO2 is considered to be the safest gas for abdominal insufflation because the risks of air embolization and spark ignition during cauterization are lower than those associated with other gases.12 Pneumoperitoneum lifts the body wall off the organs, creating a workspace (FIGURE 4). Because pneumoperitoneum increases intraabdominal pressure (IAP) and reduces the excursions of the diaphragm, laparoscopy is most commonly performed with the patient under general anesthesia and on assisted or controlled ventilation. Increasing IAP has several effects on the patient’s cardiovascular and respiratory systems.13 The hemodynamic disturbances related to an increase in IAP reported in humans and dogs are decreased cardiac output, elevation of abdominal arterial pressure, and increased systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance.13,14 The decrease in cardiac output is proportional to the increase in IAP.15 However, if IAP is maintained between 10 and 12 mm Hg, cardiac output will remain within physiologically acceptable limits.13 Normal intraperitoneal pressure in dogs ranges from −5 to 7 mm Hg, with an average of 2 mm Hg.16 When IAP is >20 mm Hg, cardiac output may become severely compromised. Pressures >40 mm Hg can create a shock-like state leading to death.16 Decreased cardiac output as a result of high IAP will remain throughout laparoscopic surgery despite surgical stimulus.14 With large increases in IAP (>30 mm Hg), the vena cava is compressed (similar to compartmentalization syndrome in dogs with gastric dilation–volvulus) and venous return (cardiac preload) is decreased.

    Abdominal organs are sensitive to increased IAP; in humans, when IAP is increased to 20 mm Hg, blood flow is compromised in all organs except the adrenal glands.17 Renal vascular resistance increases by more than 500%, and renal blood flow and glomerular filtration decrease to less than 25% of normal.14 The actual clinical effects of these physiologic changes on kidney function are not known. However, theoretically, patients with renal or cardiac disease or other underlying conditions may be more susceptible to the adverse consequences of pneumoperitoneum. The visceral capillary system also can partially collapse, leading to hypoxia of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Increases in IAP to between 20 and 40 mm Hg are associated with occlusion of blood flow in peritoneal and splanchnic capillary beds and can lead to severe intestinal ischemia.18 The pressure typically used in laparoscopy should remain as low as possible, between 10 and 12 mm Hg.

    Intrathoracic pressure also increases during peritoneal insufflation because the diaphragm is pushed cranially. This increases the patient’s work of respiration and decreases tidal volume. Decreased tidal volume adds to the decrease in venous return and increases pulmonary vascular resistance, both of which exacerbate the decreased cardiac output. As this affects the efficiency of spontaneous breathing in anesthetized patients, positive-pressure ventilation is strongly recommended for MIS procedures and is mandatory during long procedures or in compromised patients. It is beneficial to intermittently partially decompress the abdomen manually to about 6 to 10 mm Hg during long procedures, especially when extracorporeal work is being done (e.g., changing instruments, preparing biopsy or culture specimens).

    The physiologic changes mentioned above may be exacerbated when the patient is placed in the Trendelenburg position. There are conflicting reports from human research as to the effects of head-down position on cardiac output. Both an increase in cardiac output due to increased venous return and a decrease in cardiac output due to activation of carotid baroreceptors have been reported.13,14 The end result depends on intravascular volume status, presence of associated cardiac disease, choice of anesthetic drugs, and ventilation technique.19 The head-down position does decrease vital capacity, total lung volume, and pulmonary compliance due to increased weight of the abdominal viscera on the diaphragm; it also increases ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatching. Generally, the head-down position is well tolerated in healthy patients. An additional consideration for certain patients is that increases in intracranial and intraocular pressures can worsen acute glaucoma.

    Diagnostic laparoscopy can be performed with the patient under heavy sedation using local anesthesia at portal sites.20 Outpatient procedures using local anesthesia are routinely performed in human medicine.21 During these procedures, it is recommended that IAP be kept to a minimum and excessive tilting be avoided. In addition, if patients are not intubated, precautions should be taken to decrease the risk of aspiration pneumonia. It is recommended to either let the patient’s head hang over the edge of the table or to keep the Trendelenburg position to let reflux drain from the mouth, as well as to suction out the pharynx before the patient is awake.

    Absorption of Exogenous Carbon Dioxide

    CO2 is a product of normal cellular respiration and is highly diffusible. It diffuses from cells into the interstitium, where it is absorbed into the blood. From the blood, CO2 enters the lungs, where it is eliminated by respiratory gas exchange. The relatively large volume of CO2 insufflated into the abdomen during laparoscopy is readily absorbed from the peritoneum. If not evacuated manually from the abdomen at the end of the procedure, the remaining CO2 is eliminated from the body as described. This is generally well tolerated in healthy animals if ventilation can be increased to compensate for the higher amount of CO2 requiring elimination. However, elimination is compromised in animals with regional or systemic hypoperfusion. Compromised elimination leads to a buildup of CO2 in the blood (hypercarbia) and causes acid–base disturbances.

    Hypercarbia has many effects on the cardiovascular system. The direct effects are myocardial depression, decreased heart contractility and rate, systemic vasodilation, and possibly arrhythmias. By contrast, effects via sympathetic stimulation are increased heart rate (HR), contractility, and vasoconstriction. In healthy patients, an overall increase in HR, blood pressure (BP), and cardiac output and a decrease in systemic vascular resistance are observed in response to hypercarbia. However, patients with cardiopulmonary disease have decreased BP and cardiac output due to an inability to respond to sympathetic stimulation.22 Changes in the arterial concentration of CO2 (PaCO2) vary with anesthetic technique, duration of pneumoperitoneum, and patient characteristics. Increasing the ventilation rate can reverse hypercarbia caused by absorption of exogenous CO2. Thus, it is important to monitor respiratory rate in animals not on a ventilator. If increasing ventilation does not improve acidosis, a release of pneumoperitoneum may be required to improve venous return. Occasionally, PaCO2 rises after deflation of the abdomen. This can be explained by the improvement in cardiac output.14

    Pneumothorax and Anesthetic Considerations During Thoracoscopy

    The biggest challenges in thoracoscopy are working within a constantly moving environment and increasing the working space to facilitate surgery. Because the ribs are attached to the sternum and the spine, the thorax does not distend like the abdomen, and with inflation of the lungs, it can be difficult to visualize the relevant structures in the chest. Assisted ventilation is mandatory for thoracoscopic procedures. Thoracoscopy can be performed either with controlled pneumothorax, thereby slightly depressing the lung volume, or by purposely deflating one entire side of the lungs. Reducing the tidal volume and increasing the respiratory rate of patients can create controlled pneumothorax.

    Purposely deflating a section of lung is called one-lung ventilation and is one way to provide optimal visualization of the hilus of the lungs during thoracoscopic procedures; this is frequently used during human procedures. Deflation of the surrounding lobes can reduce surgical time and improve the safety of a procedure because it reduces the risk of trauma to the deflated lung lobes, but it is not required in all cases. We induce one-lung ventilation by placing an endobronchial blocker into the appropriate bronchi under bronchoscopic guidance (FIGURE 5). Because the blocker can be displaced when patients are moved from the preparation room into the operating room, it is recommended that one-lung ventilation be induced in the operating room after final positioning of the patient for surgery.9

    One-lung ventilation induces a massive right-to-left shunt in the lungs, resulting in a low V/Q mismatch.23 Thus, one-lung ventilation can induce a significant reduction in oxygen saturation. To prevent desaturation, patients should be placed on a peak end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm H2O. PEEP keeps the alveoli of the ventilator-dependent lung open, which prevents further deterioration of pulmonary gas exchange. It has been shown that one-lung ventilation for open thoracic surgery does not reduce the oxygen delivery index in dogs.23 Application of PEEP does not seem to affect oxygen delivery and cardiac output in dogs during thoracoscopy.24 Monitoring with pulse oximetry and capnography is recommended. Using this anesthesia technique, a 2005 study reported no adverse effects in nine of nine dogs, as evidenced by 100% short-term survival.9


    The basic equipment for MIS includes a rigid endoscope, monitor, video camera, high-definition TV monitor, light source, light cable, tower (cart), and high-flow CO2 insufflator, as well as various trocar–cannula units, forceps, and accessory instruments (BOXES 1 and 2). A start-up package may cost US$20,000 to US$45,000. However, because the basic equipment is the same as that used for arthroscopy, it may be possible to start laparoscopy and thoracoscopy without a large initial investment if arthroscopy is already being performed.

    BOX 1. Basic Start-up Equipment for Laparoscopy and/or Thoracoscopy

    • Tower
    • Color, high-quality TV monitor
    • Halogen or xenon adjustable light source with cable
    • CO2 insufflator, pressure monitor, and adjustable control (for laparoscopy only)
    • Video or digital recording system
    • 5- and 10-lb CO2 tanks
    • Electrosurgery unita
    • 0° 5-mm endoscope
    • 30° 5-mm endoscopea
    • Trocars (blunt and sharp; different sizes)
    • Grasping, dissecting, and cutting instruments
    • Biopsy instruments
    • Suturing instruments
    • Blunt probes

    The most commonly used endoscope in small-animal laparoscopy and thoracoscopy is a 5-mm, 0° rigid endoscope (FIGURE 6). A 0° endoscope provides the surgeon with a visual field that is in line with the true field. This type of endoscope makes orientation and manipulation of instruments easier. It also maximizes light transmission compared with endoscopes that have an offset viewing angle. The most common angled endoscope used is 30°. This type of endoscope enables visualization over the top of organs and widens the area of visualization. Regardless of type, the endoscope must be attached to a high-quality light source via a light cable. A high-intensity xenon light source is recommended because it gives the truest organ color.3 At the end of the eyepiece of the endoscope, a video camera unit is connected to a high-definition TV monitor (FIGURE 7). This projects the image at the tip of the endoscope onto a TV video monitor located across from the surgeon. The camera can be sterilized using low-temperature hydrogen peroxide gas plasma technology, or it can be placed into a disposable, sterile camera bag.

    A CO2 insufflator is used to create the pneumoperitoneum required to perform laparoscopy. It is not used for thoracoscopy. Most CO2 insufflating systems have a standard means of delivering CO2, an adjustable flow rate, and a constant or intermittent pressure reading. It is recommended to keep IAP between 10 and 12 mm Hg. We insufflate to the lowest pressure that allows the procedure to be performed efficiently and safely.

    Trocar–cannula units are used to gain access to the body cavity, provide a means to insufflate with gas, and act as portals for the endoscope and accessory instruments. After access to the cavity has been obtained, the trocar is removed and an endoscope or instrument is placed into the remaining cannula. The cannula maintains access into the cavity and prevents unnecessary trauma to the body wall from repeated removal and insertion of instruments. Trocar–cannula units come with sharp or blunt trocars and correspond to the size of the instruments to be used (FIGURE 8).

    Cannulae come in many types, subdivided into closed and open. Closed cannulae have valves within the tube that prevent gas leakage when instruments are being switched. They are used for laparoscopy and thoracoscopy (during controlled pneumothorax). Care must be taken to prevent tension pneumothorax. Open cannulae can be used for laparoscopy, but leakage of the pneumoperitoneum can prolong procedure time because it will occasionally be necessary to stop and reinsufflate. Open cannulae are most commonly used for thoracoscopy because there is no need for insufflation. Cannulae can also be rigid or soft (FIGURE 9). Rigid cannulae are most commonly used for laparoscopy and protect the endoscope. Soft cannulae are generally limited to thoracoscopy to preserve intercostal neurovascular bundles. Threaded cannulae (FIGURE 9) that screw in are also available and can be helpful during thoracoscopic procedures because they tend to remain reliably locked in place.

    BOX 2. Additional Equipment Specific to Thoracoscopy

    • Endotracheal tube with endobronchial blocker
    • Flexible endoscope for endobronchial blocker placement
    • Threaded cannulae

    Various accessory instruments are required, depending on the procedure to be performed. A palpation probe (FIGURE 10) is essential for palpating and moving abdominal and thoracic organs. Most probes have centimeter markings so that the surgeon can estimate the relative size of organs and masses. For biopsies, oval biopsy cup forceps (liver, spleen, pleura, lymph nodes, masses), punch biopsy forceps (pancreas), and Tru-Cut–style biopsy needles (kidney, deep tissue) are recommended1,2,20 (FIGURE 11). Pre-tied endoscopic ligature loops are valuable for biopsy of lung tissue, as well as for laparoscopic procedures such as cryptorchidectomy (FIGURE 11). Various grasping forceps, retractors, needle drivers, and scissors are other essential instruments (FIGURE 11).

    Clip applicators and stapling devices (FIGURE 12) are usually 10 mm in diameter and require corresponding trocar–cannula units. Stapling equipment designed specifically for MIS is available through the human medical equipment market. Although they can be expensive, stapling devices are required to perform some advanced resection procedures.

    Endoscopic GI anastomosis staplers (such as the Endo-GIA Roticulator 60 3.5 #030458, US Surgical, Norwalk, CT) simultaneously apply multiple rows of staples and cuts, leaving several rows of staples on the organ and several rows on the section to be removed. Most stapling instruments have an articulation that allows for correct placement of the staple line. This is particularly useful during lung lobectomy because it allows the bronchus, pulmonary artery, and pulmonary vein to be occluded with one cartridge of staples. Many stapling devices come in three different lengths: 30, 45, and 60 mm, with staples 2.0, 2.5, 3.5, or 4.8 mm long. A 2005 study using the Endo-GIA stapling device to perform lung lobectomy in dogs recommended the 60-mm device with 3.5-mm staples.9 Successful lung lobectomy using staples has also been reported in dogs using a stapling device designed for open surgery that applies four rows of staples.

    Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic retrieval bags (FIGURE 13) can be useful for removal of large and/or cancerous masses. These bags permit maceration of the tissue to reduce tumor size, thereby allowing removal through a portal site or a minimally extended portal site and preventing seeding of the site with cancerous cells. Although seeding of thoracoscopic incisions has occurred, the risk of cancer recurrence at the cannula site in humans is considered low (three of 934 operations).25 However, as seeding can be a serious complication and is easily prevented, the use of a thoracoscopic retrieval bag is the standard of care in human medicine.26 A human study evaluating the incidence of tumor recurrence at portal sites when a retrieval bag was used in 308 cases reported one case of recurrence after a median follow-up of 25 months.27

    Most laparoscopic instruments can perform monopolar electrocautery at their tip. In addition, the Harmonic Scalpel (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, New Brunswick, NJ) and other coagulation and cutting devices (e.g., Ligasure, Ligasure sealer/divider #LS1500, US Surgical) are available for MIS use.

    Advantages and Indications

    Laparoscopy and thoracoscopy have several advantages compared with traditional open techniques. MIS decreases the inherent stresses on the body during the postoperative period because incisions are significantly smaller, causing less tissue damage and postoperative pain.28–30 Consequently, there is less risk of postoperative seroma, dehiscence, and incisional infection, hospitalization time can be decreased, negative energy balance can be prevented, and return to function can be faster.31 GI function, including myoelectric activity and intestinal motility, has been shown to return to normal more quickly in dogs undergoing laparoscopic versus open procedures.32–34 The incidence of adhesion formation, although not a large factor in dogs and cats, is lower with laparoscopy, presumably because organs are not exposed and permitted to dehydrate.35 In humans undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, several studies have shown that pulmonary complications were minimized compared with open procedures as a result of less pain on deep inspiration, leading to better ventilation, total lung capacity, and saturation,36 with a return to baseline pulmonary function 4 to 10 days sooner.37 Although these parameters have not been studied in dogs and cats, such benefits may play a role in the improved recovery seen clinically.

    In addition, as the surgeon’s experience develops, thoracoscopic and laparoscopic procedures can be performed faster than open techniques, decreasing surgical times and the risks of prolonged anesthesia. The use of a camera and light source enables superior visualization and magnification of body cavities and organ systems compared with similar open approaches. This allows the surgeon to precisely localize the area of concern and focus the procedure. Previously inaccessible recesses can now be visualized and explored using angled endoscopes.35 Also, because thoracoscopic and laparoscopic procedures are carried out through a few small portal sites, there can theoretically be a better cosmetic end result when compared with a full-length incision. Although cosmesis is generally not as important in animals as in people, pet owners’ expectations are continually progressing. All these advantages become important when patients have systemic, chronic, or end-stage diseases that may interfere with healing potential and time at home with their family.

    Contraindications and Disadvantages

    Absolute contraindications to laparoscopy in animals include septic peritonitis and moderate to severe intraabdominal adhesions or large masses that would preclude visualization and removal. Absolute contraindications to thoracoscopy include large thoracic masses and severe pulmonary disease. Small body size (<2 kg body weight), severe obesity, mild adhesions, ascites, abnormal clotting times, and poor patient condition are relative contraindications for MIS. However, endoscopes as small as 2.7 mm have been used successfully in reptiles, fish, and birds.38–40 Excess fat can obscure vision but can be removed or avoided, adhesions can by lysed via laparoscopy, ascites fluid can be drained preoperatively or intraoperatively, and abnormal clotting times from liver disease have not been shown to always correlate with excessive bleeding from liver biopsies.10,20 Laparoscopy and thoracoscopy can be performed in severely ill patients under sedation and local anesthesia if general anesthesia is deemed too risky.20

    There are some inherent disadvantages to minimally invasive procedures. Firstly, the equipment required to perform these procedures remains expensive. However, many companies are interested in the veterinary market (e.g., Storz, Stryker, Olympus, Wolf, Dr. Fritz), and refurbished systems are available at reduced cost. Furthermore, as more veterinarians become trained in MIS, the equipment costs become easier to justify and the investment can become profitable. The instrumentation required to perform MIS procedures can be disposable or nondisposable. Disposable instruments have the benefit of always being new but can be expensive. Nondisposable products are less expensive in the long term but can be costly to repair. Similar to companies providing endoscopes and towers, some instrument suppliers are keen to work with veterinarians.

    Secondly, MIS techniques are challenging to learn. Surgeons must adapt to the hand–eye coordination requirements and lack of depth perception. As with thoracotomy, the continuous motion of the heart and lungs can pose an additional challenge in thoracoscopy. MIS involves different visual and tactile skills than traditional surgery, and this alone keeps many veterinarians from pursuing further training and advancing their skill. Thirdly, a large room and surgical team are necessary for most advanced procedures. Many procedures require a camera operator and one to two instrument operators working as a team. For thoracoscopy in particular, a knowledgeable anesthetist is also a real asset to the team. Monitoring anesthesia during MIS can be dynamic and challenging considering the effects of pneumoperitoneum, Trendelenburg or reverse Trendelenburg positions, and one-lung ventilation during thoracoscopy.


    Although being confident and competent with MIS requires a large commitment of time and money, it can be rewarding professionally, financially, and personally.

    Downloadable PDF

    Dr. Mehler discloses that he has received financial benefits from Infiniti Medical.


    1. Van Lue SJ, Van Lue AP. Equipment and instrumentation in veterinary endoscopy. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2009;39:817-837.

    2.  Freeman LJ. Gastrointestinal laparoscopy in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2009;39:903-924.

    3. McCarthy TC. Veterinary Endoscopy for the Small Animal Practitioner. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.

    4.  Collard F, Nadeau M, Carmel E. Laparoscopic splenectomy for treatment of splenic hemangiosarcoma in a dog. Vet Surg 2010;39:870-872.

    5. Mayhew KN, Mayhew PD, Sorrell-Raschi L, Cimino Brown D. Thoracoscopic subphrenic pericardectomy using double-lumen endobronchial intubation for alternating one-lung ventilation. Vet Surg 2009;38:961-966.

    6. Mayhew PD, Cimino Brown D. Prospective evaluation of two intracorporeally sutured prophylactic laparoscopic gastropexy techniques compared with laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy in dogs. Vet Surg 2009;38(6):738-746.

    7. Mayhew PD, Mehler SJ, Radhakrishnan A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for management of uncomplicated gall bladder mucocele in six dogs. Vet Surg 2008;37:625-630.

    8.  Dupré G, Fiorbianco V, Skalicky M, et al. Laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs: comparison between single portal and two-portal access. Vet Surg 2009;38:818-824.

    9.  Lansdowne JL, Monnet E, Twedt DC, et al. Thoracoscopic lung lobectomy for treatment of lung tumors in dogs. Vet Surg 2005;34:530-535.

    10. Vasanjee SC, Bubenik LJ, Hosgood G, et al. Evaluation of hemorrhage, sample size, and collateral damage for five hepatic biopsy methods in dogs. Vet Surg 2006;35:86-93.

    11. Freeman L. Veterinary Endosurgery. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1999.

    12. Magne ML, Tams TR. Laparoscopy: instrumentation and technique. In: Tams TR, ed. Small Animal Endoscopy. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1999:397-408.

    13. Duke T, Steinacher SL, Remedios AM. Cardiopulmonary effects of using carbon dioxide for laparoscopic surgery in dogs. Vet Surg 1996;25:77-82.

    14. Joris J. Anesthetic management of laparoscopy. In: Miller R, ed. Anesthesia. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1994:2011-2029.

    15. Paw P, Sackier JM. Complications of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy. J Intensive Care Med 1994;9:290-304.

    16. Iberti TJ, Kelly KM, Gentili DR, et al. A simple technique to accurately determine intra-abdominal pressure. Crit Care Med 1987;15:1140-1142.

    17. Caldwell C, Ricotta J. Changes in visceral blood flow with elevated intra-abdominal pressure. J Surg Res 1987;43:14-20.

    18. Diebel LN, Dulchavsky SA, Wilson RF. Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure on mesenteric arterial and intestinal mucosal blood flow. J Trauma 1992;33:45-48; discussion 48-49.

    19. Hirvonen EA, Nuutinen LS, Kauko M. Hemodynamic changes due to Trendelenburg positioning and pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995;39:949-955.

    20. Monnet E, Twedt DC. Laparoscopy. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2003;33:1147.

    21. Zevallos H, Shah Y, Moody L. Outpatient laparoscopy with local anesthesia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1980;17:379-381.

    22. Safran DB, Orlando R 3rd. Physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum. Am J Surg 1994;167:281-286.

    23. Kudnig ST, Monnet E, Riquelme M, et al. Effect of one-lung ventilation on oxygen delivery in anesthetized dogs with an open thoracic cavity. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:443-448.

    24. Riquelme M, Monnet E, Kudnig ST, et al. Cardiopulmonary changes induced during one-lung ventilation in anesthetized dogs with a closed thoracic cavity. Am J Vet Res 2005;66:973-977.

    25. McKenna RJ Jr. The current status of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. Chest Surg Clin North Am 1998;8:775-785, viii; discussion 787-788.

    26. Lin J, Iannettoni MD. The role of thoracoscopy in the management of lung cancer. Surg Oncol 2003;12:195-200.

    27. Parekh K, Rusch V, Bains M. VATS post site recurrence: a technique dependent problem. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:175-178.

    28. Davidson EB, Moll HD, Payton ME. Comparison of laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy and ovariohysterectomy in dogs. Vet Surg 2004;33:62-69.

    29. Devitt CM, Cox RE, Hailey JJ. Duration, complications, stress, and pain of open ovariohysterectomy versus a simple method of laparoscopic-assisted ovariohysterectomy in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:921-927.

    30. Walsh PJ, Remedios AM, Ferguson JF, et al. Thoracoscopic versus open partial pericardectomy in dogs: comparison of postoperative pain and morbidity. Vet Surg 1999;28:472-479.

    31. Culp WT, Mayhew PD, Brown DC. The effect of laparoscopic versus open ovariectomy on postsurgical activity in small dogs. Vet Surg 2009;38:811-817.

    32. Hotokezaka M, Combs MJ, Schirmer BD. Recovery of gastrointestinal motility following open versus laparoscopic colon resection in dogs. Dig Dis Sci 1996;41:705-710.

    33. Schippers E, Ottinger AP, Anurov M, et al. [Intestinal motility after laparoscopic vs conventional cholecystectomy. An animal experiment study and clinical observation]. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1992;377:14-18.

    34. Davies W, Kollmorgen CF, Tu QM, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy shortens postoperative ileus in a canine model. Surgery 1997;121:550-555.

    35. Remedios AM, Ferguson J. Minimally invasive surgery: laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in small animals. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1996;18:1191-1199.

    36. Karayiannakis AJ, Makri GG, Mantzioka A, et al. Postoperative pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 1996;77:448-452.

    37. Schauer PR, Luna J, Ghiatas AA, et al. Pulmonary function after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 1993;114:389-397; discussion 397-399.

    38. Echols S. Collecting diagnostic samples in avian patients. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 1999;2:621-649.

    39. Jekl V, Knotek Z. Endoscopic examination of snakes by access through an air sac. Vet Rec 2006;158:407.

    40. Taylor M. Endoscopy in birds and reptiles. In: Tams TR, ed. Small Animal Endoscopy. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby: 1999:433-445.

    References »

    NEXT: Minimally Invasive Abdominal and Thoracic Surgery: Techniques

    CETEST This course is approved for 3.0 CE credits

    Start Test


    Did you know... Rigid telescopes used for thoracoscopy are the same rod lens telescopes used for laparoscopy.Read More

    These Care Guides are written to help your clients understand common conditions. They are formatted to print and give to your clients for their information.

    Stay on top of all our latest content — sign up for the Vetlearn newsletters.
    • More