Welcome to the all-new Vetlearn

  • Vetlearn is becoming part of NAVC VetFolio.
    Starting in January 2015, Compendium and
    Veterinary Technician articles will be available on
    NAVC VetFolio. VetFolio subscribers will have
    access to not only the journals, but also:
  • Over 500 hours of CE
  • Community forums to discuss tough cases
    and networking with your peers
  • Three years of select NAVC Conference
  • Free webinars for the entire healthcare team

To access Vetlearn, you must first sign in or register.


  Sign up now for:
Become a Member

Compendium January 2006 (Vol 28, No 1)

Dentistry in Pet Rodents

by Anna Osofsky, DVM, DABVP (Avian), Frank J. M. Verstraete, DrMedVet, DECVS, DAVDC


    Incisor malocclusion as an isolated entity is uncommon in rodents but may occur following incisor trauma. Incisor malocclusion usually occurs concomitantly with premolar-molar malocclusion, which is especially common in chinchillas and guinea pigs. All dental patients should receive a comprehensive oral examination. Incisor"premolar"molar malocclusion with periodontal and endodontic disease is a disease complex of unknown origin that may include incisor malocclusion, distortion of the premolar-molar occlusal plane, sharp points or spikes, periodontal disease, periapical changes, apical elongation, oral soft tissue lesions, and maxillofacial abscess formation. The therapeutic options for this disease complex include continual occlusal adjustment of involved teeth, dietary modification, extraction of severely affected teeth, and abscess debridement. Because rodents with dental disease often have concurrent disease processes, a thorough systemic evaluation is usually indicated before initiating dental treatment. Balanced anesthetic technique with careful monitoring, attention to supportive care, and client education are important aspects of successfully treating rodents with dental disease.

    Dental disease is common in pet rodents, especially in species with continuously growing teeth, and includes incisor malocclusion, which usually occurs concomitantly with premolar-molar malocclusion. All dental patients should therefore receive a comprehensive oral examination. Because rodents with dental disease often have concurrent disease processes, a thorough systemic evaluation is usually indicated before initiating dental treatment. Balanced anesthetic technique with careful monitoring, attention to supportive care, and client education are important aspects of successfully treating rodents with dental disease.

    Oral Anatomy

    Dental formulas of the most common pet rodents are listed in Table 1 and depicted in Figures 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 . Rodents are generally monophyodont (i.e., having a single set of teeth) and have only one maxillary incisor.1 Chinchillas (Chinchilla lani­ger) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) have a full elodont and aradicular hypsodont dentition (i.e., continuously growing and erupting ["open-rooted"] teeth with a long anatomic crown), whereas rats (Rattus norvegicus), hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus), prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus), and most other rodents have elodont, aradicular hypsodont incisors and (anelodont) brachyodont (i.e., nongrowing, nonerupting, short-crowned, closed-rooted) premolars and molars.2-4 The incisors are extremely long; in rats, the mandibular incisors extend ventral to all molars. The maxillary incisors and mandibular incisors in guinea pigs grow and erupt at a rate of 1.9 and 2.4 mm/wk, respectively.5 The corresponding growth rates in rats are 2.1 and 2.9 mm/wk, respectively.6

    In most rodents, except guinea pigs, the enamel of the incisors is yellow-orange.1,3 The enamel is thicker on the facial aspect and tapers toward the lingual aspect, leading to the typical chisel wear pattern of these teeth.7 The occlusion of rodents is anisognathous: The mandible is typically wider than the maxilla, resulting in an occlusal plane that is angled very characteristically in rodents with elodont cheek teeth (Figures 1 and 2 ). The occlusal plane is angled slightly in chinchillas but much more in guinea pigs. The temporomandibular joint allows a large degree of rostrocaudal movement with relatively little lateral motion.1,2 Clinically important aspects of rodent dental anatomy, including normal radiographic appearance, have been described.1

    Dental Disease

    Clinical Signs

    Many signs of dental disease in rodents are nonspecific. Animals with painful teeth, jaws, or oral mucosa may be reluctant to eat or unable to prehend, chew, or swallow food properly. Clients may notice that their pet is steadily losing weight, even though food bowls require replenishment, because the food is often scattered during attempts at feeding rather than eaten. Fecal pellets often become smaller because the animal is eating less, or, if the animal is completely anorectic, fecal output may cease completely. Body fur might appear unkempt because painful animals often no longer use their mouths for grooming. Some affected rodents exhibit bruxism due to discomfort. Maxillofacial abnormalities may be palpable or evident during inspection. Excessive salivation (i.e., "slobbers") is common. Palpable facial or mandibular swelling may be due to periapical pathosis or soft tissue infection and abscessation. Dental disease should be included in the differential list for any ocular or nasal discharge. Discomfort while the jaw is manipulated and inability to completely close the mouth may be present. Incisor overgrowth and/or malocclusion are often evident during preliminary visual inspection. Although dental disease in rodents is usually chronic, these patients can present on an emergency basis because of acute decompensation.8,9

    Incisor Malocclusion

    Incisor malocclusion due to a discrepancy in jaw length is uncommon in rodents. A total lack of dietary material for gnawing may result in incisor overgrowth in rodents. Incisor overgrowth may occur subsequent to loss or fracture of an opposing incisor, possibly resulting from a fall or being dropped.10 Fracture of an incisor tooth may result in pulpal necrosis, periapical disease, and cessation of growth and eruption.

    Incisor malocclusion may also be secondary to, or occur concomitantly with, premolar-molar malocclusion. Conversely, if incisor malocclusion prevents normal mastication, it may lead to premolar-molar malocclusion. Incisor malocclusion without pre­molar-molar abnormalities may be relatively rare, especially in older chinchillas.4 Therefore, patients with incisor malocclusion should always receive a comprehensive oral examination.

    Therapeutic options for incisor malocclusion include:

    • Tooth-height reduction every 3 to 6 weeks or as needed, with appropriate dietary adjustment
    • Extraction of the involved teeth

    Incisor-Premolar-Molar Malocclusion with Periodontal and Endodontic Disease

    Incisor-premolar-molar malocclusion with periodontal and endodontic disease occurs in rodents with a full elodont, aradicular hypsodont dentition, such as chinchillas and guinea pigs (Figure 5). Affected patients typically present with a history of noticeable weight loss (or even emaciation), ocular or nasal discharge, or maxillofacial abscessation.

    The disease complex may include4,7,11:

    • Incisor overgrowth or malocclusion, as already de­scribed; in addition, apical overgrowth or "root elongation" may occur
    • Irregularity of the premolar"molar occlusal plane, resulting in a so-called "step-mouth," "wave-mouth," and/or sharp point or "spike" formation; sharp points typically occur on the lingual aspect of the mandibular teeth and the buccal aspect of the maxillary teeth
    • Intraoral elongation of premolars and molars, with possible lingual or buccal deviation
    • Periodontal disease, with increased mobility of, and path­ologic diastema formation between, premolars and molars
    • Premolar-molar periapical changes, with apical elongation and possible cortical perforation
    • Soft tissue lesions on the oral mucosa that are associated with sharp points on premolars and molars
    • Submandibular, maxillofacial, or retrobulbar abscess formation

    It is unclear whether this disease complex has a genetic, dietary, or metabolic origin (or any combination thereof). The pathophysiologic relationship among orthodontic, periodontal, and endodontic lesions is equally unclear. Not all patients show all components of the complex. The clinical examination may be misleading, and a relatively minor premolar-molar malocclusion should be considered an important clinical finding. Most of the tooth structure is located below the gingival margin and is not visible during oral examination. Therefore, diagnostic imaging is an essential aspect of examining affected patients. Apical elongation is a poorly understood phenomenon. It has been found that the cheek tooth length of wild chinchillas, clinically normal ones, and captive-bred ones with dental disease is 5.9, 7.4, and 10 mm, respectively; it was suggested that the physical form and composition of the diet are the main etiologic factors in this species.12

    Therapeutic options for incisor-premolar-molar malocclusion with periodontal and endodontic disease may include:

    • Occlusal adjustment of involved teeth
    • Extraction of teeth severely affected by endodontic and/or periodontal disease
    • Abscess debridement

    In very severe cases, euthanasia may be considered.

    Other Dental Diseases

    Hypovitaminosis C in Guinea Pigs

    Guinea pigs cannot synthesize their own vitamin C. Thus hypovitaminosis C may result from a deficient diet in this species, and the oral manifestations include gingival petechiation and periodontitis with increased tooth mobility.13 Prevention and treatment consist of dietary correction.

    Odontoma-Like Lesions in Pet Prairie Dogs

    Oral tumors appear to be very rare in pet rodents, such as chinchillas and guinea pigs.8,9,14 The purported high incidence of odontoma formation in pet prairie dogs (C. ludovicianus), an emerging pet rodent, is a notable exception.15

    An odontoma is a tumor of odontogenic origin in which both the epithelial and mesenchymal cells are well differentiated, resulting in formation of all dental tissue types.16 An odontoma may also be considered a hamartoma (i.e., a mass resembling a tumor that represents anomalous development of tissue normally present rather than a neoplasm). Odontomas are generally rare in all species but have been diagnosed in young rodents, including rats and mice.17

    A very specific syndrome occurring in pet prairie dogs (C. ludovicianus) has recently been described.15 Affected animals are middle-aged and typically present with upper airway obstruction.18 The cause of the obstruction is an odontoma-like mass originating from the root of one or both maxillary incisors. An irregular globular mass of tooth density is visible via radiography.7,15 Detailed descriptions of the histopathologic features of this disease have not been published, although it has been suggested that the mass is not an odontoma but is rather the result of the continuous apical deposition of dysplastic tooth substance.7 It has been hypothesized that these tumors develop in reaction to mechanical trauma to the maxillary incisors, secondary to chewing on bars of a cage.15,18 The recommended treatment is surgical removal of the mass and the associated tooth or teeth, which is technically difficult and traumatic.15


    Preanesthetic Evaluation

    A preanesthetic evaluation is indicated for all dental procedures requiring general anesthesia. This evaluation should ideally include a general physical examination, complete blood cell count, and biochemical profile (if patient size allows). Whole-body radiography should be conducted if indicated.19 A comprehensive evaluation is important because patients with dental disease can have concurrent diseases (e.g., pneumonia, cardiac or renal disease) or general debilitation and severe gastrointestinal (GI) stasis due to dental disease. The concurrent problems may require additional supportive care to stabilize the patient and reduce anesthetic risk. Hematologic changes associated with dental disease are generally nonspecific (e.g., anemia of chronic inflammation), but evaluating for such changes can be helpful in determining the severity of inflammation.20

    Preanesthetic Preparation

    Debilitated patients must be stabilized before anesthesia is induced, paying particular attention to hydration state, body temperature, GI tract function, nutrition, and pain management.19,21 Variable recommendations have been made regarding fasting rodents before anesthesia and dental treatment. Because prolonged fasting can lead to hypoglycemia, small rodents should generally not be fasted for more than 1 hour. Fasting for 2 to 8 hours has been recommended in guinea pigs to reduce regurgitation and retention of food in the oropharynx.19,22 Prolonged fasting is contraindicated in all rodent species because it can contribute to postanesthetic ileus.19

    Anesthetic Techniques

    Rodent anesthesia can be challenging because of small patient size and difficulty in intubating most patients.22,23 The endotracheal tube can interfere with the oral examination and dental treatment in the small oral cavity of rodents. Consequently, there is much debate regarding the best method of inducing and maintaining anesthesia for dental examination and treatment. There are three main anesthetic options:

    • Injectable anesthesia alone
    • Inhalation anesthesia alone
    • A combination of both injectable sedation/anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia

    Injectable anesthesia has the advantage of not requiring a face mask, which can interfere with access to the oral cavity; however, anesthetic depth can be difficult to control when relying entirely on this method. Inhalation anesthesia has the advantage of allowing rapid adjustments in anesthetic depth; however, struggling and apnea can occur during induction, and hypotension can occur if the inhalant is used alone for maintenance of a surgical plane of anesthesia.22 Therefore, a combination of parenteral sedation and inhalation anesthesia is preferred.24 We have found that a premedication protocol of an opioid (usually butorphanol) in combination with a benzodiazepine is satisfactory; this protocol provides both analgesia and muscle relaxation. Midazolam is the preferred benzodiazepine because it is water soluble and therefore less irritating when administered intramuscularly compared with diazepam.25

    Anesthesia can then be induced and maintained with isoflurane or sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia. Alternatively, anesthesia can be induced with a dissociative anesthetic such as ketamine in combination with an a-adrenergic agonist such as xylazine.19,22 Induction with agents that have a high risk of apnea, such as propofol and thiopental, is discouraged because of difficulty in intubating guinea pigs, chinchillas, hamsters, and mice.24,26 To allow access to the oral cavity during the use of inhalation anesthetics, patients should be fitted with an appropriately sized anesthetic mask or nose cone (Figure 6); because these patients are physiologic nasal breathers, an anesthetic mask or nose cone is adequate to maintain anesthesia. Nose cones can be created using 12- or 20-ml syringe cases with a latex glove fitted over the end as a diaphragm; a proper scavenging unit at the end of the nonrebreathing circuit and a well-fitted nose cone diaphragm are necessary to limit human exposure to inhalation anesthetics.22,27 In case of hypo­ventilation, supplemental oxygen should be supplied re­gardless of the anesthetic technique used.22 The patient's oral cavity, especially the cheek pouches of hamsters, needs to be carefully cleaned at the onset of anesthesia. Anticholinergics such as glycopyrrolate and atropine can be used as needed to reduce respiratory secretions and bradycardia.22

    Careful monitoring of the patient during anesthesia is essential.28 At a minimum, body temperature, heart rate, and respiratory rate and character should be monitored. Body temperature can decrease rapidly in small patients, so external heat should be provided via heat lamps or warm-water or forced-air blankets. Heart rate can be easily monitored with a stethoscope or a Doppler ultrasound probe. We commonly place a Doppler probe over a peripheral artery in larger rodents and the heart in small rodents. Hypoventilation is common, and apnea can be fatal if the rodent is not intubated; thus respiration must be carefully monitored visually, and oxygenation can be monitored with pulse oximetry.22 It is likely that many rodent anesthetic deaths can be avoided if careful attention is paid to patient ventilation. Anesthetic depth and head position should be adjusted as needed to maintain adequate ventilation.

    A more detailed description of anesthetic techniques in rodents is beyond the scope of this article; thorough reviews of rodent anesthesia have been conducted ­elsewhere.19,22

    Perioperative Supportive Care

    Perioperative supportive care is just as critical to a good outcome for rodents with dental disease as the dental treatment itself. Pain, hydration, nutrition, and secondary infection must be given thorough consideration.27,29,30

    Perioperative pain management is essential and can be achieved with a combination of opioids and NSAIDs.31 Pain may be difficult to recognize in rodents but can have significant adverse effects, such as reduced food and water intake, ileus, and delayed healing.7 Opioids and NSAIDs can be used together as needed in the immediate postoperative period, whereas NSAIDs can be prescribed for home use. For a routine occlusal adjustment, a single dose of an opioid is often sufficient, whereas NSAIDs can be continued for 3 to 5 days; consideration must be given to the potential adverse effects of NSAIDs, such as GI bleeding and reduced renal blood flow, especially because little information is available on the therapeutic ranges of these drugs in guinea pigs and chinchillas.31-33 If a major procedure (e.g., incisor extraction) has been performed, several days of opioid analgesia may be needed. Although many opioids have been used in rodents, butorphanol and buprenorphine are preferred to pure µ-agonists (e.g., morphine, oxymorphone), which increase the risk of inducing ileus.34

    Rodents often have reduced water intake after dental procedures, especially during the early stages of treatment; therefore, hydration status must be monitored closely.29 Although fluids can be provided intravenously and intraosseously if needed, subcutaneous fluid therapy is often sufficient; the recommended maintenance dose is 50 to 100 ml/kg/day of a balanced replacement fluid.35,36 Using a 19- to 25-gauge butterfly catheter increases the ease of administering subcutaneous fluids and reduces the amount of restraint required.

    Nutrition and GI function are essential components of the peridental assessment and treatment period. Affected patients may not be able to eat because of severe dental disease or discomfort from the dental treatment. Regardless of the cause, anorectic patients must be given nutritional support.29,37,38 For guinea pigs and chinchillas, syringe feeding a timothy hay-based, balanced herbivorous diet at 50 ml/kg/day is preferred. An option for all rodent species is feeding a gruel made of species-appropriate soaked pellets that have been processed in a blender.36 Syringe feeding vegetable baby food is discouraged because it is not a balanced diet and does not have the necessary fiber content to promote normal GI function in some rodents. Guinea pigs on a poor diet should receive ascorbic acid supplementation.36 Some patients may eat soaked pellets or a syringe-fed diet directly from a dish placed in their cage. Syringe feeding is often needed for 3 to 5 days after a dental treatment; however, long-term feeding may be needed in cases of severe dental disease.38 Although feeding tubes can be placed in many rodent species, the tubes can be cumbersome to main­tain and are often not needed.37 In addition to anor­exia, GI stasis commonly accompanies dental disease and its treatment. GI stasis can be managed with an appropriate diet, hydration, and pain management and prokinetic drugs such as metoclopramide (0.2 to 1 mg/kg PO, SC, or IM q12h) or cisapride (0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg PO q8-12h).39,40

    Secondary infections must be treated. Facial abscesses are frequently associated with dental disease, but infection of oral ulcers, bacterial rhinitis, dacryocystitis due to apical elongation, and even pneumonia can occur secondary to dental disease. Appropriate antibiotic treatment should be selected based on aerobic and anaerobic culture and sensitivity testing of the abscess capsule, nasal discharge, nasolacrimal duct flush, or, if possible, a specimen obtained via ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of consolidated lung lobes.38 To our knowledge, no research has been conducted to determine the most common pathogens in rodent oral abscesses. In rabbits, these abscesses have been found to contain both aerobic and anaerobic pathogens, so antimicrobials must be chosen appropriately.38,41 Broad-spectrum antibiotics are considered ideal, but choices are limited in many species, especially guinea pigs, chinchillas, and hamsters, because of the risk of fatal disruption of normal GI flora.42-45 Duration of therapy depends on the site and source of infection. Infected oral ulcers may require a relatively short treatment length of 10 to 14 days, whereas maxillofacial osteomyelitis may require many months of antimicrobial therapy. Table 2 29,39,41,46-49 lists the antibiotics and dosages we have found to be most effective in treating dental-associated facial abscesses in guinea pigs and chinchillas, which are the two species that most commonly have this condition.

    Dental Techniques

    Oral Examination

    Rodents typically have a small mouth opening and a long and narrow oral cavity, making a complete oral examination in an awake patient nearly impossible. In addition, these species are generally easily stressed by manual restraint. A cursory examination can be performed by using an otoscope, a lighted nasal speculum (Figure 7), or a video otoscope.10,50

    Routine use of general anesthesia is recommended for oral examination, minor procedures, and major oral surgery. Inhalation anesthesia can be administered using a face mask for oral examination and minor procedures, such as incisor crown-height reduction and abscess debridement. Extractions and major oral surgery should be performed only with proper endotracheal intubation, venous access for fluid administration, and adequate anesthetic monitoring.

    Oral examination is greatly facilitated by using oral speculums specifically designed for use in rabbits and rodents: One speculum should be placed between the incisor teeth, opening the mouth in a vertical plane, while a second speculum, known as a pouch dilator, should be placed perpendicular to the first one to open the mouth in a horizontal plane (Figure 8). Alternatively, the patient can be placed on an operating platform with an attached speculum. Good lighting, magnification, and suction facilitate the oral examination. With the oral cavity opened by means of the speculums, the tongue should be gently retracted and the dental quadrants inspected. Care should be taken not to lacerate the tongue on the mandibular incisors. Use of a small dental explorer is indicated to assess tooth mobility and increased pocket formation; a periodontal probe is usually too large to be used in small rodents.


    Radiography is an essential part of a comprehensive oral examination. Skull radiography is an extremely useful diagnostic tool in patients suspected to have malocclusion, periapical lesions, or bone disease (Figure 9). The small size of rodents and the superposition of dental quadrants make radiologic interpretation difficult. Magnified radiographic studies can be obtained using radiography units with a very small (0.1-mm) focal spot and 100-mA capability. The tube should be brought relatively close to the patient (decreasing the source object distance [SOD]) and the film further from the patient (increasing the object imaging device distance [OID]) at about the same source imaging device distance (SID) as that used for standard radiographs. The magnification is SID/SOD and can be up to three times. Alternatively, high-resolution mammography film or dental film can be used. Laterolateral, dorsoventral, and two oblique views are recommended to fully evaluate the teeth, maxillae, and mandibles. Occlusal views, although desirable, are difficult to obtain and interpret. In a recent report,51 computed tomography (CT; Figure 10 ) was found to be more useful than conventional radiography in diagnosing dental problems in chinchillas, but CT adds considerably to the cost of the diagnostic workup.

    Tooth-Height Reduction and Occlusal Adjustment

    Tooth-Height Reduction of Incisors

    Tooth-height reduction of incisors can be carried out using a cylindrical diamond bur on a high-speed handpiece (Figure 11). Care should be taken to avoid thermal damage to the pulp: A very light touch is used to avoid having to use cooling fluid; alternatively, the oropharynx can be packed if an endotracheal tube is used. A tongue depressor can be placed behind the incisors to stabilize the jaws and protect the lips and tongue. Care should be taken to restore the normal occlusal plane (incisive edge) angulation. The exposed dentin of the incisive surface of rodents has minimal permeability, and no adverse effects on the pulp should be expected.52 If the tooth-height reduction is correctly performed, pulp exposure should not occur; however, if it does, partial pulpectomy and direct pulp capping are indicated. An intermediate restorative material should be used for filling the pulp cavity opening; harder materials like composites are not indicated because they may interfere with normal attrition.21

    Using a cutting disk on a straight handpiece or Dremel tool (Mount Prospect, IL) is not recommended because soft tissue can easily be traumatized by these large tools. Nail trimmers and wire cutters are contraindicated be­cause they crush the teeth, fracturing and splitting them, which in turn may cause pulp exposure. This not only is very painful but also may lead to periapical pathosis.21,53

    Occlusal Adjustment of Premolars And Molars

    Occlusal adjustment of the premolars and molars, including height reduction and smoothing sharp points and spikes, can safely be performed using a round diamond bur on a straight handpiece (Figure 12). A rabbit and rodent tongue spatula or a regular dental cement spatula can be used for retracting and protecting the oral soft tissue. Small handheld files are not very effective and tend to cause soft tissue trauma. Care should be taken to restore the normal occlusal plane angulation and to check the premolar-molar and incisor occlusion during the procedure. If a clinician is not familiar with the normal anatomy and occlusion of a rodent, it is advisable to have normal skull specimens available for reference.

    Occlusal adjustment should be performed at regular intervals as indicated by the severity of the disease. Following occlusal adjustment, some rodents, especially guinea pigs, may be unable to close their mouths.7 This is believed to be caused by chronic stretching of the muscles of mastication associated with tooth elongation. Use of neoprene "headgear" to improve masticatory function and increase attrition has been recommended for this.7,54

    Extraction Techniques


    Incisor extraction is complicated by the great length of the teeth involved. Very careful and patient luxation is the technique of choice. Small, sharp luxators can be used for this.7 Alternatively, flattened and bent, suitably sized hypodermic needles can be used.55 After the epithelial attachment has been cut with a small scalpel blade, the luxator should be carefully inserted into the periodontal space and gradually moved in an apical direction, with the clinician concentrating on, and alternating between, the mesial and distal aspect of the tooth. Some expansion of the alveolar bone plate invariably occurs, but care should be taken to limit this and avoid leverage. Once the periodontal ligament has been severed, the tooth will slide out of the alveolus along the curved growth path. This can be facilitated by using suitably sized extraction forceps. However, because of the curvature of these teeth and their trapezoid cross-section, rotational movements with the extraction forceps are not indicated. Alternating slight longitudinal traction and intrusion is appropriate in the final stage of the extraction.

    Leverage, torque, and premature longitudinal traction may lead to iatrogenic tooth fracture. A retained tooth tip generally causes the tooth to regrow if the pulp remains vital. Preexisting periapical lesions cannot resolve in the presence of a retained tooth tip. It is advisable to remove all four first incisors if the treatment objective is to prevent incisor malocclusion. If a single incisor must be extracted (e.g., for a complicated crown fracture with pulp necrosis), it is generally unnecessary to extract the opposing incisor. The lateral movement of the occlusion is sufficient to cause even wear of the remaining incisors.

    Premolars and Molars

    Extraction of aradicular hypsodont premolars and molars is difficult because of the size of the embedded portion of the teeth, the limited access, and the close proximity of the teeth. The bone plate separating the alveoli from the nasal cavity and orbit and the mandibular cortex overlying the alveoli are very thin, making iatrogenic damage easily possible, especially if bone lysis is present as a result of dental disease. Various techniques have been described for extracting premolars and molars56:

    • The extraoral surgical approach (which is similar to repulsion in horses)
    • The buccotomy approach (incising the cheek to gain access)
    • The intraoral nonsurgical technique

    The intraoral nonsurgical technique requires considerable skill and patience but is less traumatic. It must be emphasized that extraction of aradicular hypsodont teeth not only is technically difficult but also requires considerable anesthetic and nursing care support, which may make referral a better option.

    Recommendations to Clients

    Clients must be counseled on managing pets with dental disease. In cases of mild disease, encouraging the pet to eat an appropriate diet can reduce progression of dental disease.7,9 For example, converting guinea pigs and chinchillas to a primarily timothy hay diet rather than a primarily pelleted diet can encourage increased chewing and appropriate attrition of the teeth.57 In more severe cases, a return to a normal diet may not be possible and all that can be done is to find a balanced diet that affected animals can eat, such as soaked pellets and formulated syringe-feeding diets. Clients must also be taught what clinical signs to watch for as indicators that their pet is having problems with its teeth, such as dropping food, reduced appetite, smaller fecal pellets, and ptyalism. Clients must be educated about the chronic nature of dental disease in many rodent patients, especially guinea pigs and chinchillas, because education early in the course of treatment can prevent frustration later when the pet must be returned for treatment every 4 to 12 weeks for the rest of its life.

    Downloadable PDF

    1. Crossley DA: Clinical aspects of rodent dental anatomy. J Vet Dent 12(4):131-135, 1995.

    2. Wiggs B, Lobprise H: Dental anatomy and physiology of pet rodents and lagomorphs, in Crossley DA, Penman S (eds): Manual of Small Animal Dentistry, ed 2. Cheltenham, UK, British Small Animal Veterinary Association, 1995, pp 68-73.

    3. Kertesz P: A Colour Atlas of Veterinary Dentistry & Oral Surgery, ed 1. London, Wolfe Publishing, 1993.

    4. Verstraete FJM: Advances in diagnosis and treatment of small exotic mammal dental disease. Semin Avian Exot Pet Med 12(1):37-48, 2003.

    5. Shadle AR, Valvo NI, Eckhert KM: The extrusive growth and attrition of the incisor teeth of Cavia cobaya. Anat Rec 71:497-502, 1938.

    6. Shadle AR, Wagner LG, Jacobs T: The extrusive growth and attrition of the incisors in albino and hybrid Rattus norvegicus (Erxleben). Anat Rec 64(3):321-325, 1936.

    7. Legendre LF: Oral disorders of exotic rodents. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 6(3):601-628, 2003.

    8. Schaeffer DO, Donnelly TM: Disease problems of guinea pigs and chinchillas, in Hillyer EV, Quesenberry KE (eds): Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents: Clinical Medicine and Surgery. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1997, pp 260-281.

    9. Crossley DA: Dental disease in chinchillas in the UK. J Small Anim Pract 42(1):12-19, 2001.

    10. Harcourt-Brown FM: Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of dental disease in pet rabbits. In Pract 19(8):407-421, 1997.

    11. Wagner JE: Miscellaneous disease conditions of guinea pigs, in Wagner JE, Manning PJ (eds): The Biology of the Guinea Pig. New York, Academic Press, 1976, pp 227-234.

    12. Crossley DA, del Mar Miguelez M: Skull size and cheek-tooth length in wild-caught and captive-bred chinchillas. Arch Oral Biol 46(10):919-928, 2001.

    13. Wiggs RB, Lobprise HB: Dental disease in rodents. J Vet Dent 7(3)2-, 1990.

    14. Manning PJ: Neoplastic diseases, in Wagner JE, Manning PJ (eds): The Biology of the Guinea Pig. New York, Academic Press, 1976, pp 214-225.

    15. Phalen DN, Antinoff N, Fricke ME: Obstructive respiratory disease in prairie dogs with odontomas. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 3(2):513-517, 2000.

    16. Kramer IRH, Pindborg JJ, Shear M: Histological Typing of Odontogenic Tumours, ed 2. Berlin & New York, Springer-Verlag, 1992.

    17. Finkel MP, Lombard LS, Staffeldt EF, et al: Odontomas in Peromyscus leucopus. J Natl Cancer Inst 63(2):407-411, 1979.

    18. Wagner RA, Garman RH, Collins BM: Diagnosing odontomas in prairie dogs. Exotic DVM 1(1)2-0, 1999.

    19. Heard DJ: Anesthesia, analgesia, and sedation of small mammals, in Quesenberry KE, Carpenter JW (eds): Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents: Clinical Medicine and Surgery, ed 2. St. Louis, Saunders, 2004, pp 356-369.

    20. McClure DE: Clinical pathology and sample collection in the laboratory rodent. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 2(3):565-590, 1999.

    21. Crossley DA: Oral biology and disorders of lagomorphs. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 6(3):629-659, 2003.

    22. Cantwell SL: Ferret, rabbit, and rodent anesthesia. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 4(1):169-191, 2001.

    23. Costa DL, Lehmann JR, Harold WM, et al: Transoral tracheal intubation of rodents using a fiberoptic laryngoscope. Lab Anim Sci 36(3):256-261, 1986.

    24. Flecknell PA: Laboratory Animal Anesthesia, ed 2. London, Academic Press, 1996.

    25. Borkowski R, Karas AZ: Sedation and anesthesia of pet rabbits. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 14(1):44-49, 1999.

    26. Harkness JE, Wagner JE: The Biology and Medicine of Rabbits and Rodents, ed 4. Media, PA, Williams & Wilkins, 1995.

    27. Wiggs B, Lobprise H: Prevention and treatment of dental problems in rodents and lagomorphs, in Crossley DA, Penman S (eds): BSAVA Manual of Small Animal Dentistry, ed 2. Cheltenham, UK, British Small Animal Veterinary Association, 1995, pp 84-91.

    28. Bailey JE, Pablo LS: Anesthetic monitoring and monitoring equipment: Application in small exotic pet practice. Semin Avian Exot Pet Med 7(1):53-60, 1998.

    29. Quesenberry KE: Guinea pigs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 24(1):67-87, 1994.

    30. Crossley DA: Burring elodont cheek teeth in small herbivores. Vet Rec 148(21):671-672, 2001.

    31. Flecknell PA: Analgesia of small mammals. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 4(1):47-56, 2001.

    32. Basivireddy J, Jacob M, Pulimood AB, et al: Indomethacin-induced renal damage: Role of oxygen free radicals. Biochem Pharmacol 67(3):587-599, 2004.

    33. Kourounakis PN, Tsiakitzis K, Kourounakis AP, et al: Reduction of gastrointestinal toxicity of NSAIDs via molecular modifications leading to antioxidant anti-inflammatory drugs. Toxicology 144(1-3):205-210, 2000.

    34. De Winter BY, Boeckxstaens GE, De Man JG, et al: Effects of mu- and kappa-opioid receptors on postoperative ileus in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 339(1):63-67, 1997.

    35. Quesenberry KE, Donnelly TM, Hillyer EV: Biology, husbandry, and clinical techniques of guinea pigs and chinchillas, in Quesenberry KE, Carpenter JW (eds): Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, ed 2. St. Louis, Saunders, 2004, pp 232-244.

    36. Oglesbee BL: Emergency medicine for pocket pets, in Bonagura JD, Kirk RW (eds): Kirk's Current Veterinary Therapy, ed 12. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1995, pp 1328-1331.

    37. Antinoff N: Small mammal critical care. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 1(1):153-175, 1998.

    38. Crossley DA: Small mammal dentistry, in Quesenberry KE, Carpenter JW (eds): Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, ed 2. St. Louis, Saunders, 2004, pp 370-382.

    39. Morrisey JK, Carpenter JW: Formulary, in Quesenberry KE, Carpenter JW (eds): Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, ed 2. St. Louis, Saunders, 2004, pp 436-444.

    40. Hillyer EV, Quesenberry KE: Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents: Clinical Medicine and Surgery, ed 1. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1997.

    41. Tyrrell KL, Citron DM, Jenkins JR, et al: Periodontal bacteria in rabbit mandibular and maxillary abscesses. J Clin Microbiol 40(3):1044-1047, 2002.

    42. Fritz PE, Hurst WJ, White WJ, et al: Pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in guinea pigs. Lab Anim Sci 37(5):646-651, 1987.

    43. Young JD, Hurst WJ, White WJ, et al: An evaluation of ampicillin pharmacokinetics and toxicity in guinea pigs. Lab Anim Sci 37(5):652-656, 1987.

    44. Richardson VCG: Diseases of Small Domestic Rodents, ed 2. Oxford, UK, Blackwell Publishing, 2003.

    45. Adamcak A, Otten B: Rodent therapeutics. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 3(1):221-237, 2000.

    46. Carpenter JW: Exotic Animal Formulary, ed 3. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2005.

    47. Quesenberry KE, Donnelly TM, Hillyer EV: Disease problems of chinchillas, in Quesenberry KE, Carpenter JW (eds): Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents: Clinical Medicine and Surgery, ed 2. St. Louis, Saunders, 2004, pp 255-265.

    48. Kasten MJ: Clindamycin, metronidazole, and chloramphenicol. Mayo Clin Proc 74(8):825-833, 1999.

    49. Plumb DC: Plumb's Veterinary Drug Handbook, ed 5. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2005.

    50. Jenkins JR: Soft tissue surgery and dental procedures, in Hillyer EV, Quesenberry KE (eds): Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents: Clinical Medicine and Surgery. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1997, pp 227-239.

    51. Crossley DA, Jackson A, Yates J, et al: Use of computed tomography to investigate cheek tooth abnormalities in chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger). J Small Anim Pract 39(8):385-389, 1998.

    52. Vongsavan K, Vongsavan N, Matthews B: The permeability of the dentine and other tissues that are exposed at the tip of a rat incisor. Arch Oral Biol 45(11):927-930, 2000.

    53. Gorrel C: Humane dentistry [letter]. J Small Anim Pract 38(1):31, 1997.

    54. Legendre LF: Malocclusions in guinea pigs, chinchillas and rabbits. Can Vet J 43(5):385-390, 2002.

    55. Wiggs B, Lobprise H: Prevention and treatment of dental problems in rodents and lagomorphs, in Crossley DA, Penman S (eds): Manual of Small Animal Dentistry, ed 2. Cheltenham, UK, British Small Animal Veterinary Association, 1995, pp 84-91.

    56. Wiggs RB, Lobprise HB: Veterinary Dentistry: Principles and Practice, ed 1. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997.

    57. Legendre LF: Oral disorders of exotic rodents. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 6(3):601-628, 2003.

    References »

    NEXT: Editorial: "Welcome to 2006!"


    Did you know... Although dolichocephaly alone is not a predisposing factor for oronasal fistulas, it appears to allow fistulas to form more readily than does mesocephaly or brachycephaly.Read More

    These Care Guides are written to help your clients understand common conditions. They are formatted to print and give to your clients for their information.

    Stay on top of all our latest content — sign up for the Vetlearn newsletters.
    • More