Welcome to the all-new Vetlearn

  • Vetlearn is becoming part of NAVC VetFolio.
    Starting in January 2015, Compendium and
    Veterinary Technician articles will be available on
    NAVC VetFolio. VetFolio subscribers will have
    access to not only the journals, but also:
  • Over 500 hours of CE
  • Community forums to discuss tough cases
    and networking with your peers
  • Three years of select NAVC Conference
  • Free webinars for the entire healthcare team

To access Vetlearn, you must first sign in or register.


  Sign up now for:
Become a Member

Compendium February 2009 (Vol 31, No 2)

Anesthesia, Diagnostic Imaging, and Surgery of Fish

by E. Scott Weber, VMD, MSc, Chick Weisse, VMD, DACVS, Tobias Schwarz, Charles Innis, VMD, Alan Klide

    CETEST This course is approved for 3.0 CE credits

    Start Test


    Anesthesia, diagnostic imaging, and surgery of fish have become routine parts of aquatic animal medicine. Anesthesia may be required for simple clinical procedures, diagnostic testing, or more involved surgery. Diagnostic modalities, including radiology, ultrasonography, and endoscopy, can be readily applied to fish and may provide valuable information. Despite some unique challenges, surgery can be performed in fish using basic surgical skills and principles and should be considered as a valid treatment option.

    Although unique and challenging in some respects, anesthesia induction, imaging, and surgery can be performed in fish with standard equipment that is readily available. In addition, the practitioner can take advantage of many of the same diagnostic modalities and drugs that are used in mammals. Therefore, clinicians with the requisite knowledge can offer many of these services with only a modest investment.


    Many substances have been used to anesthetize fish, including ethanol, diethyl ether, halothane, lidocaine, tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222), eugenol, ketamine, metomidate, propofol, and carbon dioxide.1-8 MS-222 is the anesthetic agent most commonly used in fish and the only one approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in food fish (with a withdrawal time of 21 days).9 It is a slightly acidic water-soluble powder. When it is used in an anesthetic bath, sodium bicarbonate can be added at a ratio of 1 mg MS-222 to 1 mg sodium bicarbonate by weight to minimize the decrease in pH of the water.6 However, sodium bicarbonate is commonly used with MS-222 only for freshwater fish, as saltwater fish benefit from the buffering capacity of sea water and saltwater mixes. Higher ratios of sodium bicarbonate are thought to decrease the amount of MS-222 required for anesthesia, but this has not proved necessary with low-dose MS-222 in our experience.

    MS-222 dose requirements vary among fish species, but most teleost fish can be anesthetized at 60 to 150 mg/L, and the dosage does not seem dependent on fish size or age. The dose can be adjusted incrementally as needed to achieve optimal anesthetic depth. Fish such as sharks, skates, rays, and seahorses may be more sensitive to MS-222, and a lower initial dose should be considered (e.g., 50 to 70 mg/L). Starting with lower doses of MS-222 should also be considered for debilitated patients.


    Depending on the specific drug and circumstances, anesthetic agents may be administered by intramuscular, subcutaneous, or intravenous injection; by mouth; or by immersion (bath). For short procedures, anesthesia is generally achieved by immersing the fish in an MS-222 bath. For longer procedures, continuous delivery can be maintained by pumping anesthetic-containing water over the gills.1,4 In most cases, this is achieved by manually injecting the water into the mouth using an appropriately sized syringe. MS-222 has been classified as a human retinotoxin, so gloves and goggles should be worn when contact is unavoidable.10

    Fish surgical tables can be designed with recirculating pump systems to deliver the anesthetic agent and oxygen and remove carbon dioxide while maintaining surgical access.7 The system shown in FIGURE 1 and FIGURE 2 was made from a commercial rat cage, with the water and water pump in the bottom and the top serving as the surgery table. The slots in the top allow the water pumped through the fish's mouth to return to the tank after passing through the gill slits. This particular rat cage was chosen because it can be sterilized in an autoclave between patients. Regardless of the system, an aerator stone should be used to oxygenate the water during surgery, maintaining normal arterial blood oxygen levels and exchanging carbon dioxide across the gills. Oxygen levels can be monitored by a meter in the anesthetic bath water. Oxygen can be "bubbled" into the anesthetic bath during long procedures, but a low flow is essential to avoid supersaturation and gas bubble disease.

    Stages and Signs

    Various indices have been published for the stages of anesthesia in fish.8 When a fish is placed in an MS-222 bath, it usually exhibits an excitatory phase with increased opercular movements. Within several minutes, however, the fish decreases purposeful movements, becomes ataxic, swims irregularly, and starts turning on its side. Eventually, it turns to dorsal recumbency and sinks to the bottom of the container. The respiratory rate, as identified by opercular movement, slows in a dose-dependent manner. Presumably, ventilation is decreased as the opercular and oral movements decrease. If the fish is deeply anesthetized, opercular movements will cease completely, and assisted ventilation should be instituted. Assisted ventilation may be performed manually by moving the fish forward in the water (never backward) or mechanically with a pump circulating water at a rate sufficient to maintain normal levels of arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide over the gills in a cranial-to-caudal direction. With assisted ventilation, care should be taken to gently keep the mouth open and not hold the animal in a manner that prevents the gill flaps or operculum from opening.


    Heart rate may be monitored by ultrasonography, electrocardiography (ECG), Doppler probe, or pulse oximetry. Ultrasonography can provide a clear image of the heart in most fish to assess rate and contractility. A Doppler flow probe can be placed in one of three positions: on the isthmus (region on the ventral surface of the head between and slightly caudal to the opercula); inside the operculum between the caudal aspect of the gills and the body wall, aiming toward the heart; or on the dorsal surface of the tongue (if the mouth is large enough). Pulse oximetry in fish uses an esophageal, rectal, finger, or tongue probe, but the saturation readings may be inconsistent. The use of peripheral oxygen saturation data in fish is still experimental, but pulse oximetry shows the heart rate, and we have found it useful for anesthetic monitoring compared with ultrasonography in several species. The rectal pulse oximetry probe can be held on the dorsal surface of the tongue of many fish species. The tongue probe works on the fins in some fish, but this varies among fins and fish (FIGURE 2). An ECG monitor can be connected to hypodermic needles placed subcutaneously, with one needle on each side between the branchiostegal membrane and the pectoral fins, and one needle approximately 25 mm caudal to the anal fin (depending on fish size; FIGURE 3). ECG may be inconsistent in some fish, and in some cases, the electrical activity of the heart may not be reflected accurately in the ECG trace.


    Fish should be allowed to revive in anesthetic-free water until strong opercular movements are observed, then put into a recovery tank when they can swim and maintain proper buoyancy. If the fish does not maintain strong opercular movements and forward swimming motion, water should be pumped into the mouth or the fish manually moved forward until it can swim and ventilate normally. The water should have an aerator stone in it for aeration using a standard aquarium air pump that uses room air. Adding oxygen directly to the tank can cause sedation of fish or result in the pathologic formation of gas bubbles in the branchial or ocular capillaries.


    Several reviews of nociception in fish have been recently published,11,12 and there are some research data about the use of opioids in fish.13-15 Dosing is complicated by the fact that the temperature and pH of fish are different from those of warm-blooded animals (i.e., the temperature is lower, and the pH is higher). This may influence the chemical configuration of some analgesics and, hence, their availability and dose.16 While there are few clinical data on the use of analgesics in fish, most fish practitioners assume that fish sense pain and use analgesics accordingly. Clinically, we have used both opiates and NSAIDs in fish, but no definitive trends have been noted. Drugs such as carprofen, meloxicam, ketoprofen, flunixin meglumine, butorphanol, morphine, and buprenorphine may be used, but the dose and dosing interval are at the discretion of the clinician. At New England Aquarium, flunixin meglumine is routinely used in teleost fish at a dose of 0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg IM every 3 to 5 days. Butorphanol at 0.1 to 0.4 mg/kg IM as a single dose just prior to recovery from anesthesia has produced no obvious adverse effects, but antinociception has not been demonstrated.17

    Diagnostic Imaging and Endoscopy

    Fish were among the first species to be evaluated by radiography.18 However, the use of radiography and computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis in fish is relatively recent.7,17,19-32 Radiography is easily performed while the fish is sedated in lateral recumbency (FIGURE 4). The ability to obtain a dorsoventral view depends on morphology. Suspected skeletal and coelomic abnormalities are the most common indications for radiography. Most fish lack sufficient intracoelomic fat to provide radiographic detail of the internal soft tissue organs. However, the swimbladder is generally obvious and can be evaluated for abnormal shape, compression, or deviation7,19-21 (FIGURE 5). Vertebral deviations and malformations of the spinal cord are common in fish22,28,29 (FIGURE 6). Iodinated or barium sulfate contrast media can be used for gastrointestinal (GI) contrast studies and to evaluate the origin of coelomic masses24,30 (FIGURE 7). Contrast medium is generally administered orally to the sedated fish via gavage tube. To avoid repeated sedation, the contrast agent can be infused into the stomach and the colon simultaneously; this produces a nearly complete GI contrast study within several minutes in most carnivorous and omnivorous species with short GI tracts.

    Helical CT is an excellent way to investigate skeletal and soft tissue abnormalities in fish and has the advantage of rapid acquisition of full-body images. Compared with conventional radiography, CT can provide more detail for assessing skeletal malformations and soft tissue masses in fish (FIGURE 8).

    Diagnostic ultrasonography has been used in larger pet fish and in aquaculture.33-41 Clinically, ultrasonography is most useful for evaluation of ascites, soft tissue masses, reproductive organs, and liver size and echogenicity (FIGURE 9). Other imaging modalities such as fluoroscopy and nuclear scintigraphy have also been used in fish, with some success.23

    Endoscopy may be a useful diagnostic technique for evaluating fish.42 Rigid and flexible endoscopes from 1.5 to 3 mm in optical diameter can be used for GI endoscopy, examination of the gills, and laparoscopy (FIGURE 10). Biopsy channels and surgical sheaths in these endoscopes allow for the introduction of specialized biopsy and surgical instruments. For gastroscopy and colonoscopy, visualization may be improved by infusing sterile 0.9% saline solution through the endoscope sheath or biopsy channel, similar to the technique used for cystoscopy in mammals. The saline helps dilate the lumen of the GI tract and clear away debris. For colonoscopy, the endoscope is introduced into the cloaca with the aid of continuous saline infusion. The endoscopist must differentiate the rectal orifice from the urethral and oviduct orifices. The amount of saline infused into the cloaca should be monitored carefully to avoid excessive pressure. Although GI mucosal lesions are relatively rare in fish, endoscopic examination and biopsy provide a simple method of excluding them.

    Laparoscopy may be used in fish to evaluate reproductive activity and perform organ biopsies and endosurgical procedures.42,43 At the New England Aquarium, laparoscopy has been used to obtain liver biopsy samples and examine the reproductive tract. Typically, a ventral paramedian incision is made 1 to 3 cm anterior to the anus, depending on the species. The incision need only be large enough to allow introduction of the endoscope (generally about 1 cm). Insufflation of the coelom can be achieved by infusing a 0.9% saline solution or carbon dioxide through the endoscope sheath. A precision digital insufflator must be used with carbon dioxide to ensure that intracoelomic pressure does not become excessive. In most cases, a pressure of 3 to 4 mm Hg suffices. Minimally invasive endosurgical techniques (e.g., sterilization) are being developed for fish and will undoubtedly help to reduce patient stress, pain, and healing time compared with traditional open laparotomy.43 Laparoscopy incisions can usually be closed with one or two simple interrupted nylon skin sutures.


    Common indications for surgery include neoplasia; ocular conditions; swimbladder disorders; biopsy of the liver, kidneys, or spleen; reproductive problems; and foreign body ingestion. In public aquaria, surgery may be required for both cosmetic and medical conditions. For example, fish can become unexhibitable due to dermal or ocular lesions that can be corrected surgically7,17,19-21,25,42-44 (FIGURE 11).

    Fish surgery requires an intimate knowledge of comparative anatomy and presents some unique challenges. The presence of running water makes it difficult to maintain a clean, dry, sterile surgical field and raises safety concerns in the presence of electrical equipment. Fish depend on mucus to protect their epidermal and dermal skin layers; therefore, the skin must be kept moist during long procedures. The presence of large scales and a typically immobile skin surface can further complicate certain procedures. Some species possess venom glands located near fin rays or barbs. Also, many species of fish have no eyelids, so the eyes can be easily damaged during surgery. The eyes can be protected using a sterile eye lubricant, which may have to be applied frequently during the procedure. On some occasions, sterile gauze can be loosely placed over a 1-mm layer of eye lubricant to afford greater protection if the procedure involves manipulation or will last longer than 45 minutes.

    Perioperative antibiotics have historically been recommended for clean-contaminated (or "dirtier") procedures in mammals or when infection would be catastrophic. In our practices, all fish undergoing intracoelomic procedures receive perioperative antibiotics, as well as a postoperative course lasting 1 to 4 weeks (e.g., ceftazidime 30 mg/kg IM q72h). Fish undergoing uncomplicated external surgery usually receive only perioperative antibiotics or none at all.

    Sterile preparation of the surgical field is typically omitted in fish to preserve the skin and its protective mucus. Wiping the area with a sterile saline-soaked cotton swab or dilute povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine can remove gross contamination, although at least one study found no difference in wound healing among trout given presurgical and postsurgical topical povidone-iodine antiseptic preparation versus those that received none.45 For marine species, rinsing the surgical site with sterile fresh water may help to reduce surface bacterial numbers. If very large scales are present, removal of a row of scales will facilitate both incision and closure. This is accomplished by applying gentle caudal tension on each scale with a hemostat. If performed with care, the scales will regrow quickly.

    We have found large, clear, transparent plastic drapes with no adhesive or precut apertures to be the most useful for isolating the surgical field. These drapes adhere well to the wet skin of the fish and help prevent desiccation. A small bead of lubricating jelly can be applied to the surface of the fish to aid in securing the drape. The small size and typically scaly skin surface of patients preclude the routine use of towel clamps, although they may help in certain cases.

    Different surgical procedures require different surgical instruments, but we regularly use surgical loupes, vascular clips, and microsurgical, bipolar electrocautery, and suction devices. A number of surgical procedures have been described.7,17,19-21,25,43,44 Coelomic incisions are preferably closed in two layers when possible. However, large abdominal tumors leading to massive coelomic swelling, diminished appetite, and muscle loss can result in thinning of the body wall, and only a single-layer closure may be possible (FIGURE 12). Evacuation of excessive coelomic air is recommended following tumor removal to aid in recovering buoyancy.

    The choice of suture material depends on the type of procedure, anatomic location, patient size and type, tension, healing processes, surgical performance and expectations, and surgeon preference. Most surgeons avoid multifilament sutures because of their wicking potential when submerged in water containing bacteria. It is unclear whether absorbable sutures are degraded and phagocytized in fish or simply expelled as foreign bodies, but some (e.g., polyglyconate) have been confirmed to undergo degradation by hydrolysis.46 One study showed that synthetic suture materials are generally better tolerated than organic sutures, concluding that monofilament polyglyconate produced the mildest inflammatory reactions at 7 and 14 days.46 This study also reflected our experience that monofilament nylon (typically a nonreactive suture material in mammals) causes a substantial inflammatory reaction46 (FIGURE 13). Therefore, synthetic, absorbable, monofilament suture material is recommended. Cyanoacrylate has been shown to delay healing and result in surgical complications, although one study reported complete, uncomplicated wound healing within 14 days when it was used in channel catfish.47 We have observed tissue reactions to cyanoacrylate in some species of marine fish. The choice of suture pattern has not been demonstrated to alter surgical outcome, but continuous patterns are often preferred to facilitate rapid closure and improve resistance to fluid leakage into the coelomic cavity. We prefer an appositional pattern to an inverting or everting closure (FIGURE 14).

    Suture removal is performed without anesthesia if possible, or under light sedation for intractable fish. Skin healing has been reported to occur in various species in 8 to 26 days.45,47,48 We remove sutures 2 to 3 weeks postoperatively in temperate and tropical species. For species with very low metabolic rates (i.e., those from cold marine environments), suture removal is often delayed for 6 to 10 weeks.


    The authors would like to recognize the radiology staff at the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine and the Animal Health Department staffs at the Adventure Aquarium in Camden, New Jersey, and the New England Aquarium in Boston, Massachusetts. This body of work could not have been accomplished without everyone's work and support. A special thank you goes out to Ms. Loujeanne Cuje and Dr. Zach Matzkin.

    Downloadable PDF

    Dr. Weisse discloses that he has received financial support from Flexstent Medical Corporation and Infiniti Medical.

    1. Lewbart GA, Harms C. Building a fish anesthesia delivery system. Exotic DVM 1999;1(2):25-28.

    2. Brown LA. Anesthesia and restraint. In: Stoskopf MK, ed. Fish Medicine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992:79-90.

    3. Ross LG, Ross BR. Anaesthetic and Sedative Techniques for Aquatic Animals. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Scientific; 1999.

    4. Stetter MD. Fish and amphibian anesthesia. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 2001;4(1):69-82.

    5. Miller SA, Mitchell MA, Heatley JJ, et al. Clinical and cardiorespiratory effects of propofol in the spotted bamboo shark (Chylloscyllium plagiosum). J Zoo Wildl Med 2005;36(4):673-676.

    6. Allen JL, Harman PD. Control of pH in MS-222 anesthetic solutions. The Progressive Fish-Culturist 1970;32(2):100.

    7. Weisse C, Weber ES, Matzkin Z, Klide A. Surgical removal of a seminoma from a black sea bass. JAVMA 2002;220(2):280-283.

    8. McFarland WN. A study of the effects of anesthetics on the behavior and physiology of fishes. Publ Inst Mar Sci Univ Texas 1959;6:23-55.

    9. Haskell, SRR, Payne MA, Webb AI, et al. Current approved drugs for aquatic species. JAVMA 2004;224(1):50-51.

    10. Bernstein PS, Digre KB, Creel DJ. Retinal toxicity associated with occupational exposure to the fish anesthetic MS-222. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;124(6):843-844.

    11. Rose JD. The neurobehavioral nature of fishes and the question of awareness and pain. Rev Fish Sci 2001;10(1):1-38.

    12. Sneddon LU, Braithwaite VA, Gentle MJ. Do fish have nociceptors? Evidence for the evolution of a vertebrate sensory system. Proc Biol Sci 2003;270(1520):1115-1121.

    13. Sneddon LU, Braithwaite VA, Gentle MJ. Novel object test: examining nociception and fear in the rainbow trout. J Pain 2003; 4(8):431-440.

    14. Nathalie CN, Gamperl AK, Stevens ED. Cardiorespiratory effects and efficacy of morphine sulfate in winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus). Am J Vet Res 2007;8:592-597.

    15. Newby NC, Mendonça PC, Gamperl K, Stevens ED. Pharmacokinetics of morphine in fish: winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) and seawater-acclimated rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 2006;143:275-283.

    16. Stevens ED, Balahura RJ. Aspects of morphine chemistry important to persons working with cold-blooded animals, especially fish. Comp Med 2007;57(2):161-166.

    17. Harms CA, Lewbart GA. Surgery in fish. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 2000;3(3):759-774.

    18. Mayrhofer E, Bors HG. The world's first radiographs of animals - the atlas of Eder and Valenta (Vienna, February 1896). Wien Tierarztl Mschr 1995;82:377-382.

    19. Harms CA, Bakal RS, Khoo LH, et al. Microsurgical excision of an abdominal mass in a gourami. JAVMA 1995;207:1215-1217.

    20. Lewbart GA, Spodnick G, Barlow N, et al. Surgical removal of an undifferentiated abdominal sarcoma from a koi carp (Cyprinus carpio). Vet Rec 1998;143(20):556-558.

    21. Lewbart GA, Stone EA, Love NE. Pneumocystectomy in a Midas cichlid. JAVMA

    22. Bakal RS, Love NE, Lewbart GA, Berry CR. Imaging a spinal fracture in a Kohaku koi (Cyprinus carpio): techniques and case history report. Vet Rad Ultrasound 1998;39:318-321.

    23. Beregi A, Szekely C, Bekesi L, et al. Radiodiagnostic examination of the swimbladder of some fish species. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica 2001;49:87-98.

    24. Beregi A, Molnar K, Bekesi L, Szekely C. Radiodiagnostic method for studying swimbladder inflammation caused by Anguillicola crassus (Nematoda: Dracunculoidea). Dis Aquat Org 1998;34;155-160.

    25. Britt T, Weisse C, Weber ES, et al. Use of pneumocystoplasty for overinflation of the swim bladder in a goldfish. JAVMA 2002;221:690-693.

    26. Love NE, Lewbart GA. Pet fish radiography: technique and case history reports. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1997;38:24-29.

    27. Gudmundsson O, Tryggvadottir SV, Petursdottir T, Halldorsdottir K. Measurements of feed intake and excretion in fish using radiography or chemical indicators. Water Sci Technol 1995;31:131-136.

    28. Hansen HJ, Yalew ZT. Morphologic features of perosomus ("short spine") in farmed salmon (Salmo salar). A preliminary report. Vet Radiol 1988;29:52-53.

    29. Kvellestad A, Hoie S, Thorud K, et al. Platyspondyly and shortness of vertebral column in farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar in Norway — description and interpretation of pathologic changes. Dis Aquat Org 2000;39:97-108.

    30. Peres G, Rigal A. Transit time in the digestive tract of fish. Critique of a radiographic method in trout (Salmo gairdnerii). Bulletin de la Societe des Sciences Veterinaires et de Medecine Comparee de Lyon 1976;78:339-344.

    31. Smith SA, Smith BJ. Xeroradiographic and radiographic anatomy of the channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1994;35:384-389.

    32. Talbot C, Higgins PJ. A radiographic method for feeding studies on fish using metallic iron powder as a marker. J Fish Biol 1983;23:211-220.

    33. Gumpenberger M. Ultrasound diagnosis — ultrasonographic detection of spinal malformation in a chub (Leuciscus cephalus L.). Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2002;43:584-585.

    34. Bosworth BG, Holland M, Brazil BL. Evaluation of ultrasound imagery and body shape to predict carcass and fillet yield in farm-raised catfish. J Anim Sci 2001;79:1483-1490.

    35. Boyce NP. Ultrasound imaging used to detect cysts of Henneguya salminicola (Protozoa: Myxozoa) in the flesh of whole Pacific salmon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1985;42:1312-1314.

    36. Blythe B, Helfrich LA, Beal WE, et al. Determination of sex and maturational status of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) using ultrasonic imaging. Aquaculture 1994;125:175-184.

    37. Martin-Robichaud DJ, Rommens M. Assessment of sex and evaluation of ovarian maturation of fish using ultrasonography. Aquaculture Res 2001;32:113-120.

    38. Mattson NS. A new method to determine sex and gonad size in live fishes by using ultrasonography. J Fish Biol 1991;39:673-677.

    39. Poppe TT, Midtlyng PJ, Sande RD. Examination of abdominal organs and diagnosis of deficient septum transversum in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., using diagnostic ultrasound imaging. J Fish Dis 1998;21:67-72.

    40. Poppe T, Nygaard SMR. Ultrasonic imaging as a diagnostic tool for checking the health of brood fish. Norsk Veterinaertidsskrift 1999;111:5-9.

    41. Sande RD, Poppe TT. Diagnostic ultrasound examination and echocardiography in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Vet Rad Ultrasound 1995;36:551-558.

    42. Stoskopf MK. Surgery. In: Stoskopf MK, ed. Fish Medicine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992:79-90.

    43. Hernandez-Divers SJ. Reproductive endoscopy and endosurgery of Gulf of Mexico sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi) and short-nosed sturgeon (A. brevirostrum). Proc AAZV/AAWV/NAG Ann Conf 2005:127-128.

    44. Nadelstein B, Bakal R, Lewbart GA. Orbital exenteration and placement of a prosthesis in fish. JAVMA 1997;211:603-606.

    45. Wagner GN, Stevens ED, Harvey-Clark C. Wound healing in rainbow trout following surgical site preparation with a povidone-iodine antiseptic. J Aquatic Anim Health 1999;11:373-382.

    46. Hurty CA, Brazik DC, Law JM, et al. Evaluation of the tissue reactions in the skin and body wall of koi (Cyprinus carpio) to five suture materials. Vet Rec 2002;151(11):324-328.

    47. Nemetz TG, MacMillan JR. Wound healing of incisions closed with cyanoacrylate adhesive. Trans Amer Fish Soc 1998;117:190-195.

    48. Phromsuthirak P. Electron microscopy of wound healing in the skin of Gasterosteus aculeatus. J Fish Biol 1977;11:193-206.

    References »

    NEXT: Clinic Resources — Anatomic Checklist for the Oral Examination of Dogs and Cats

    CETEST This course is approved for 3.0 CE credits

    Start Test


    Did you know... A plan for dealing with inadvertent abdominal injuries should be developed before laparoscopic surgery.Read More

    These Care Guides are written to help your clients understand common conditions. They are formatted to print and give to your clients for their information.

    Stay on top of all our latest content — sign up for the Vetlearn newsletters.
    • More